Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36554395›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Evaluation of Movement Restriction of Spinal Orthoses Using Inertial Measurement Units.

Justyna Fercho, Michał Krakowiak, Rami Yuser, Tomasz Szmuda, Piotr Zieliński, Dariusz Szarek, Samuel D Pettersson, Grzegorz Miękisiak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Justyna FerchoNeurosurgery Department, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9845-4961
Michał KrakowiakNeurosurgery Department, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0817-7989
Rami YuserScientific Circle of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Neurosurgery Department, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland.
Tomasz SzmudaNeurosurgery Department, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1904-6773
Piotr ZielińskiNeurosurgery Department, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland.
Dariusz SzarekDepartment of Neurosurgery, Marciniak's Hospital, 54-049 Wrocław, Poland.
Samuel D PetterssonScientific Circle of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Neurosurgery Department, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-214 Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4703-1624
Grzegorz MiękisiakInstitute of Medicine, Opole University, 45-052 Opole, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6781-7013
Gdańsk Medical University · PLSzpital im Tadeusza Marciniaka · PLUniversity of Opole · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the frequent use of orthopedic braces or spine stabilizers in diseases such as kyphosis, lordosis, and scoliosis, as well as in the case of injuries and rehabilitation after surgeries, there is no clear evidence of their proper stabilization of the spine while carrying out daily activities. This study sought to assess the spine's mobility while wearing three different orthopedic braces while performing basic tasks. Ten healthy subjects were enrolled. Three Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) were attached superficially along the spine at approximate levels: cervical (C7), between thoracic (T8) and lumbar (L3), and sacrum. The angle between sensors was monitored to provide data on the sagittal profile. In addition, the displacement of the spine's longitudinal axis was measured (rotation). There are three types of orthopedic braces: the semi-rigid Hohmann corset, the Jewett brace, and the Thoracolumbar Fixed Spinal Orthosis (TLSO). Four tasks were monitored: standing, sitting, walking, and picking up an item from the floor with one hand. All braces provided a similar level of stability in both the sagittal plane and rotational axis while lifting an object. On the other hand, while walking and sitting, the TLSO was the only orthosis providing a statistically significant rigidity in the sagittal plane. When performing a more voluntary task, the measured rigidity of softer braces was significantly increased when compared with more involuntary tasks. A certain degree of motion restriction with spinal orthoses may come from the feedback pressure, which stimulates paraspinal muscles to contract and thus increases the overall rigidity of the trunk.

Indexed as

LordosisScoliosisBracesHumansOrthotic DevicesRotationSpinebiomechanicsbracemotion analysisorthosisspinewearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID36554395
PMCPMC9779723
OpenAlexW4311956765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.