Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36554320›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Occupational Safety and Health with Technological Developments in Livestock Farms: A Literature Review.

Marie A Hayden, Menekse S Barim, Darlene L Weaver, K C Elliott, Michael A Flynn, Jennifer M Lincoln

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Industrial Robotics and the Future of Work.American journal of industrial medicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marie A HaydenDivision of Field Studies and Engineering, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH 45213, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0832-7537
Menekse S BarimDivision of Field Studies and Engineering, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH 45213, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5148-6512
Darlene L WeaverDivision of Safety Research, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8750-3927
K C ElliottOffice of the Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Anchorage, AK 99508, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4054-573X
Michael A FlynnDivision of Science Integration, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH 45226, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5338-5360
Jennifer M LincolnOffice of the Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH 45213, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5050-263X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent decades, there have been considerable technological developments in the agriculture sector to automate manual processes for many factors, including increased production demand and in response to labor shortages/costs. We conducted a review of the literature to summarize the key advances from installing emerging technology and studies on robotics and automation to improve agricultural practices. The main objective of this review was to survey the scientific literature to identify the uses of these new technologies in agricultural practices focusing on new or reduced occupational safety risks affecting agriculture workers. We screened 3248 articles with the following criteria: (1) relevance of the title and abstract with occupational safety and health; (2) agriculture technologies/applications that were available in the United States; (3) written in English; and (4) published 2015-2020. We found 624 articles on crops and harvesting and 80 articles on livestock farming related to robotics and automated systems. Within livestock farming, most (78%) articles identified were related to dairy farms, and 56% of the articles indicated these farms were using robotics routinely. However, our review revealed gaps in how the technology has been evaluated to show the benefits or potential hazards to the safety and well-being of livestock owners/operators and workers.

Indexed as

LivestockOccupational HealthAgricultureAnimalsCrops, AgriculturalFarmsHumansUnited Statesagriculture livestockartificial intelligencecomputer visionoccupational safety and healthroboticssensors

Identifiers

PMID36554320
PMCPMC9778243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.