Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36554045›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Application of Prenatal Whole Exome Sequencing for Structural Congenital Anomalies-Experience from a Local Prenatal Diagnostic Laboratory.

Theodora Hei Tung Lai, Leung Kuen Sandy Au, Yuen Ting Eunice Lau, Hei Man Lo, Kelvin Yuen Kwong Chan, Ka Wang Cheung, Teresa Wei Ling Ma, Wing Cheong Leung, Choi Wah Kong, Wendy Shu and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Theodora Hei Tung LaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0132-693X
Leung Kuen Sandy AuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9032-5807
Yuen Ting Eunice LauDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Hei Man LoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Kelvin Yuen Kwong ChanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Ka Wang CheungDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Teresa Wei Ling MaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Wing Cheong LeungDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Kwong Wah Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1851-2138
Choi Wah KongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, United Christian Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Wendy ShuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Pamela Youde Netherland Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5626-6308
Po Lam SoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Anna Ka Yee KwongDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Christopher Chun Yu MakDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Mianne LeeDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9004-2284
Martin Man Chun ChuiDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Brian Hon Yin ChungDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Anita Sik Yau KanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7379-003X

Funding

Society of the Relief of Disabled Children, and 8th Phase Government Matching Grant (SRDC - Where for Rare) N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fetal structural congenital abnormalities (SCAs) complicate 2-3% of all pregnancies. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) has been increasingly adopted prenatally when karyotyping and chromosomal microarray do not yield a diagnosis. This is a retrospective cohort study of 104 fetuses with SCAs identified on antenatal ultrasound in Hong Kong, where whole exome sequencing is performed. Molecular diagnosis was obtained in 25 of the 104 fetuses (24%). The highest diagnostic rate was found in fetuses with multiple SCAs (29.2%), particularly those with involvement of the cardiac and musculoskeletal systems. Variants of uncertain significance were detected in 8 out of the 104 fetuses (7.7%). Our study shows the utility of WES in the prenatal setting, and the extended use of the technology would be recommended in addition to conventional genetic workup.

Indexed as

genetic counsellingprenatal diagnosisprenatal whole exome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID36554045
PMCPMC9778831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.