Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36554023›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Comparison between Olympic Weightlifting Lifts and Derivatives for External Load and Fatigue Monitoring.

Joaquim Paulo Antunes, Rafael Oliveira, Victor Machado Reis, Félix Romero, João Moutão, João Paulo Brito

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Biomechanical Adaptations in Foot Characteristics Among Elite Male Weightlifters: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Should We Use the Men Load-Velocity Profile for Women in Deadlift and Hip Thrust?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joaquim Paulo AntunesSports Science School of Rio Maior-Polytechnic Institute of Santarém, 2040-413 Rio Maior, Portugal.
Rafael OliveiraSports Science School of Rio Maior-Polytechnic Institute of Santarém, 2040-413 Rio Maior, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-6671-6229
Victor Machado ReisResearch Centre in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development, 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4996-1414
Félix RomeroSports Science School of Rio Maior-Polytechnic Institute of Santarém, 2040-413 Rio Maior, Portugal.
João MoutãoSports Science School of Rio Maior-Polytechnic Institute of Santarém, 2040-413 Rio Maior, Portugal.
João Paulo BritoSports Science School of Rio Maior-Polytechnic Institute of Santarém, 2040-413 Rio Maior, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4357-4269
Life Quality Research Centre · PTUniversity of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro · PT

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDB/04045/2020Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDP/04748/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Load management is an extremely important subject in fatigue control and adaptation processes in almost all sports. In Olympic Weightlifting (OW), two of the load variables are intensity and volume. However, it is not known if all exercises produce fatigue of the same magnitude. Thus, this study aimed to compare the fatigue prompted by the Clean and Jerk and the Snatch and their derivative exercises among male and female participants, respectively. We resorted to an experimental quantitative design in which fatigue was induced in adult individuals with weightlifting experience of at least two years through the execution of a set of 10 of the most used lifts and derivatives in OW (Snatch, Snatch Pull, Muscle Snatch, Power Snatch, and Back Squat; Clean and Jerk, Power Clean, Clean, High Hang Clean, and Hang Power Clean). Intensity and volume between exercises were equalized (four sets of three repetitions), after which one Snatch Pull test was performed where changes in velocity, range of motion, and mean power were assessed as fatigue measures. Nine women and twelve men participated in the study (age, 29.67 ± 5.74 years and 28.17 ± 5.06 years, respectively). The main results showed higher peak velocity values for the Snatch Pull test when compared with Power Snatch (p = 0.008; ES = 0.638), Snatch (p < 0.001; ES = 0.998), Snatch Pull (p < 0.001, ES = 0.906), and Back Squat (p < 0.001; ES = 0.906) while the differences between the Snatch Pull test and the derivatives of Clean and Jerk were almost nonexistent. It is concluded that there were differences in the induction of fatigue between most of the exercises analyzed and, therefore, coaches and athletes could improve the planning of training sessions by accounting for the fatigue induced by each lift.

Indexed as

Clean and Jerkload monitoringOlympic exercisespowerPower CleanSnatchSquatweightlifting derivatives

Identifiers

PMID36554023
PMCPMC9777922
OpenAlexW4312126364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.