Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36553975›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Impact of Two Resuscitation Sequences on Alveolar Ventilation during the First Minute of Simulated Pediatric Cardiac Arrest: Randomized Cross-Over Trial.

Laurent Suppan, Laurent Jampen, Johan N Siebert, Samuel Zünd, Loric Stuby, Florian Ozainne

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05474170 (Impact of 2 Resuscitation Sequences on Alveolar Ventilation During the First Minute of Simulated Pediatric Cardiac Arrest), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05474170 nacompletednot on this map

Impact of 2 Resuscitation Sequences on Alveolar Ventilation During the First Minute of Simulated Pediatric Cardiac Arrest: Randomized Cross-Over Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorGeneve TEAM AmbulancesRan2022 to 2022Enrolled28ConditionsCardiopulmonary Arrest, Pediatric ALL, ResuscitationArmsAHA resuscitation sequence, ERC resuscitation sequence
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Laurent SuppanDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva University Hospitals, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6989-6421
Laurent JampenESAMB-École Supérieure de Soins Ambulanciers, College of Higher Education in Ambulance Care, 1231 Conches, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6073-1997
Johan N SiebertDepartment of Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Geneva Children's Hospital, Geneva University Hospitals, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2871-3382
Samuel ZündService de la Protection et de la Sécurité, 2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Loric StubyGenève TEAM Ambulances, 1201 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1663-5249
Florian OzainneESAMB-École Supérieure de Soins Ambulanciers, College of Higher Education in Ambulance Care, 1231 Conches, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6635-0271
HES-SO Genève · CHUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CHUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation regularly publishes a Consensus on Science with Treatment Recommendations, but guidelines can nevertheless differ when knowledge gaps persist. In case of pediatric cardiac arrest, the American Heart Association recommends following the adult resuscitation sequence, i.e., starting with chest compressions. Conversely, the European Resuscitation Council advocates the delivery of five initial rescue breaths before starting chest compressions. This was a superiority, randomized cross-over trial designed to determine the impact of these two resuscitation sequences on alveolar ventilation in a pediatric model of cardiac arrest. The primary outcome was alveolar ventilation during the first minute of resuscitation maneuvers according to the guidelines used. A total of 56 resuscitation sequences were recorded (four sequences per team of two participants). The ERC approach enabled higher alveolar ventilation volumes (370 mL [203−472] versus 276 mL [140−360], p < 0.001) at the cost of lower chest compression fractions (57% [54;64] vs. 66% [59;68], p < 0.001). Although statistically significant, the differences found in this simulation study may not be clinically relevant. Therefore, and because of the importance of overcoming barriers to resuscitation, advocating a pediatric-specific resuscitation algorithm may not be an appropriate strategy.

Indexed as

alveolar ventilationbag-valve-mask ventilationcardiopulmonary resuscitationchest compression fractionparamedicspediatric cardiac arrestrandomized trialsimulation studystudy protocol

Identifiers

PMID36553975
PMCPMC9777645
OpenAlexW4311527396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.