Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36553964›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Assessment of the Use of Patient Vital Sign Data for Preventing Misidentification and Medical Errors.

Jared Maul, Jeremy Straub

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jared MaulDepartment of Computer Science, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102, USA.
Jeremy StraubDepartment of Computer Science, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102, USA.

Funding

Research CoresP20GM103442 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA · PI Chris Jurgens · 2012 to 2026
$53.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103442NIH HHS P20GM103442
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient misidentification is a preventable issue that contributes to medical errors. When patients are confused with each other, they can be given the wrong medication or unneeded surgeries. Unconscious, juvenile, and mentally impaired patients represent particular areas of concern, due to their potential inability to confirm their identity or the possibility that they may inadvertently respond to an incorrect patient name (in the case of juveniles and the mentally impaired). This paper evaluates the use of patient vital sign data, within an enabling artificial intelligence (AI) framework, for the purposes of patient identification. The AI technique utilized is both explainable (meaning that its decision-making process is human understandable) and defensible (meaning that its decision-making pathways cannot be altered, just optimized). It is used to identify patients based on standard vital sign data. Analysis is presented on the efficacy of doing this, for the purposes of catching misidentification and preventing error.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencegradient descent trained expert systemmedical error preventionpatient identificationvital sign data

Identifiers

PMID36553964
PMCPMC9777871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.