Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36553925›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Targeting Cerebellum with Non-Invasive Transcranial Magnetic or Current Stimulation after Cerebral Hemispheric Stroke-Insights for Corticocerebellar Network Reorganization: A Comprehensive Review.

Eleni Aikaterini Ntakou, Grigorios Nasios, Anastasia Nousia, Vasileios Siokas, Lambros Messinis, Efthimios Dardiotis

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eleni Aikaterini NtakouDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital of Larissa, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, 41100 Larissa, Greece.
Grigorios NasiosDepartment of Speech and Language Therapy, University of Ioannina, 45500 Ioannina, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-7495-6863
Anastasia NousiaDepartment of Speech and Language Therapy, University of Ioannina, 45500 Ioannina, Greece.
Vasileios SiokasDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital of Larissa, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, 41100 Larissa, Greece.
Lambros MessinisLab of Cognitive Neuroscience, School of Psychology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Efthimios DardiotisDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital of Larissa, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, 41100 Larissa, Greece.ORCID 0000-0003-2957-641X
University of Thessaly · GRUniversity of Ioannina · GRAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) has emerged as one of the methods implemented in stroke rehabilitation. Cerebellar stimulation has gained research interest as an alternative strategy to cortical stimulation, based on the role of the cerebellum and corticocerebellar tracts in different motor and cognitive functions. This review investigates the role of the cerebellum in motor and cognitive rehabilitation following cerebral stroke using NIBS techniques combined with other therapies (e.g., speech or physical therapy). Fifteen randomized clinical trials were included. The majority of the literature findings point towards the cerebellum as a promising neurostimulation target following stroke of the cerebral cortex. Findings concern mostly rehabilitation of gait and balance, where cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) of the contralesional cerebellar hemisphere produce, in the presented clinical sample, improved performance and plasticity changes in the corticocerebellar network, combined with other rehabilitation methods. Data regarding aphasia rehabilitation are scarce, with right cerebellar tDCS exercising some impact in individual linguistic functions combined with language therapy. Based on recent data concerning cerebellar functions and corticocerebellar networks, along with the development of clinical protocols regarding non-invasive cerebellar (NICS) application, the cerebellum can prove a crucial intervention target in rehabilitation following stroke.

Indexed as

cerebellar stimulationrehabilitationstroketDCSTMS

Identifiers

PMID36553925
PMCPMC9778071
OpenAlexW4311005179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.