ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Automatic Identification of a Depressive State in Primary Care.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) performs well in screening depression in primary care. However, people are looking for alternatives because it screens for too many items. With the popularity of social media platforms, facial movement can be recorded ecologically. Considering that there are nonverbal behaviors, including facial movement, associated with a depressive state, this study aims to establish an automatic depression recognition model to be easily used in primary healthcare. We integrated facial activities and gaze behaviors to establish a machine learning algorithm (Kernal Ridge Regression, KRR). We compared different algorithms and different features to achieve the best model. The results showed that the prediction effect of facial and gaze features was higher than that of only facial features. In all of the models we tried, the ridge model with a periodic kernel showed the best performance. The model showed a mutual fund R-squared (R2) value of 0.43 and a Pearson correlation coefficient (r) value of 0.69 (p < 0.001). Then, the most relevant variables (e.g., gaze directions and facial action units) were revealed in the present study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.