Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36553428›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Ultrasound Imaging-Based Methods for Assessing Biological Maturity during Adolescence and Possible Application in Youth Sport: A Scoping Review.

Eva Rüeger, Nicole Hutmacher, Patric Eichelberger, Claus Löcherbach, Silvia Albrecht, Michael Romann

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Skeletal Age Evaluation with BAUSportJournal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparative Analysis of Maturation Prediction Methods (Moore, Mirwald, BAUSportJournal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eva RüegerDepartment of Elite Sport, Swiss Federal Institute of Sport Magglingen, 2532 Magglingen, Switzerland.
Nicole HutmacherSchool of Health Professions, Physiotherapy, Bern University of Applied Science, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
Patric EichelbergerSchool of Health Professions, Physiotherapy, Bern University of Applied Science, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2223-6113
Claus LöcherbachSwiss Olympic Medical Center, Swiss Federal Institute of Sport Magglingen, 2532 Magglingen, Switzerland.
Silvia AlbrechtSwiss Olympic Medical Center, Swiss Federal Institute of Sport Magglingen, 2532 Magglingen, Switzerland.
Michael RomannDepartment of Elite Sport, Swiss Federal Institute of Sport Magglingen, 2532 Magglingen, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4139-2955

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone maturity is an indicator for estimating the biological maturity of an individual. During adolescence, individuals show heterogeneous growth rates, and thus, differences in biological maturity should be considered in talent identification and development. Radiography of the left hand and wrist is considered the gold standard of biological maturity estimation. The use of ultrasound imaging (US) may be advantageous; however, its validity and reliability are under discussion. The aims of this scoping review are (1) to summarize the different methods for estimating biological maturity by US imaging in adolescents, (2) to obtain an overview of the level of validity and reliability of the methods, and (3) to point out the practicability and usefulness of ultrasound imaging in the field of youth sports. The search included articles published up to November 2022. The inclusion criteria stipulated that participants had to fall within the age range of 8 to 23 years and be free of bone disease and fractures in the region of interest. Nine body regions were investigated, while the hand and wrist were most commonly analyzed. US assessment methods were usually based on the estimation of a bone maturity stage, rather than a decimal bone age. Furthermore, 70% of the assessments were evaluated as applicable, 10% expressed restraint about implementation, and 20% were evaluated as not applicable. When tested, inter- and intra-rater reliability was high to excellent. Despite the absence of ionization, low costs, fast assessment, and accessibility, none of the US assessments could be referred to as a gold standard. If further development succeeds, its application has the potential to incorporate biological age into selection processes. This would allow for more equal opportunities in talent selection and thus make talent development fairer and more efficient.

Indexed as

biological maturitybone agetalent developmentultrasonographyyouth sport

Identifiers

PMID36553428
PMCPMC9776568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.