Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36553370›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Persistence of Lockdown Consequences on Children: A Cross-sectional Comparative Study.

Marina Picca, Paola Manzoni, Antonio Corsello, Paolo Ferri, Chiara Bove, Piera Braga, Danila Mariani, Roberto Marinello, Angela Mezzopane, Silvia Senaldi and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Marina PiccaSICuPP-Lombardia: Italian Primary Care Paediatrics Society-Lombardy, 20126 Milan, Italy.
Paola ManzoniSICuPP-Lombardia: Italian Primary Care Paediatrics Society-Lombardy, 20126 Milan, Italy.
Antonio CorselloDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4578-0066
Paolo FerriDepartment of Human Sciences, State University Milano Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8860-0937
Chiara BoveDepartment of Human Sciences, State University Milano Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy.
Piera BragaDepartment of Human Sciences, State University Milano Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy.
Danila MarianiSICuPP-Lombardia: Italian Primary Care Paediatrics Society-Lombardy, 20126 Milan, Italy.
Roberto MarinelloSICuPP-Lombardia: Italian Primary Care Paediatrics Society-Lombardy, 20126 Milan, Italy.
Angela MezzopaneSICuPP-Lombardia: Italian Primary Care Paediatrics Society-Lombardy, 20126 Milan, Italy.
Silvia SenaldiSICuPP-Lombardia: Italian Primary Care Paediatrics Society-Lombardy, 20126 Milan, Italy.
Marina MacchiDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Marco CugliariDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.
Carlo AgostoniDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5006-0832
Gregorio Paolo MilaniDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3829-4254

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic had a significant psychological impact on children and adolescents. This study compared lockdown effects on children aged 1-10 years in 2020 and 2021. Two structured questionnaires were administered to 3392 parents in 2020, and 3203 in 2021. Outcomes considered for the data analysis included sleep changes, episodes of irritability, attention disturbances, distance learning and number of siblings. For data analysis, children were divided into two groups: pre-scholar (1-5 years old) and older ones. The lockdown was associated with a significant increase in sleep disturbances in 2020 and persisted after a year. The high prevalence of mood changes persisted unchanged in children under the age of 10 in 2020 and in 2021. Even if strengthened family ties seemed to mitigate the negative impact of lockdowns in 2020, this effect appeared absent or at least reduced in 2021. Irritability and rage in children were perceived to have increased in 2021 compared to 2020. A significant reduction in digital device use was observed in 2021 compared to 2020. Overall, the most harmful consequences of the lockdown in 2020 were still observed in 2021. Further studies are needed to analyze possible psychological effects that the generation who experienced the pandemic during early childhood may have, particularly in their future adolescence, in order to identify possible intervention practices to support families.

Indexed as

COVID-19 pediatricsdistance learninglockdown impactSARS-CoV-2 childrensleep disturbances toddlers

Identifiers

PMID36553370
PMCPMC9776603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.