Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36553367›Full record

ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Observational Tools Using Video Recordings of Parent-Child Feeding Interactions: A Narrative Review.

Gessica D'Angeli, Martina Mesce, Luca Cerniglia, Silvia Cimino

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gessica D'AngeliDepartment of Dynamic, Clinical and Health Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00186 Rome, Italy.
Martina MesceDepartment of Dynamic, Clinical and Health Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00186 Rome, Italy.
Luca CernigliaFaculty of Psychology, International Telematic University Uninettuno, 00186 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6115-288X
Silvia CiminoDepartment of Dynamic, Clinical and Health Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00186 Rome, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · ITUniNettuno University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current research has confirmed that the quality of the caregiver-child relationship influences the child's emotional and behavioral development. Play and feeding contexts, for example, are the best contexts to observe mother-child or father-child interaction. The observation of feeding interaction establishes involvement on the part of both parties and identifies relationship characteristics. The purpose of this study is to select and describe the most frequently used observational methods during feeding interactions in the first three years of a child's life. Instruments that employ video recordings of mealtimes will be detailed to highlight the relevance that specific tools have nowadays. Finally, the SVIA (Scala di Valutazione delle Interazioni Alimentari), a technique for analyzing food interactions by observation that has also been utilized remotely, will be offered. This is intended to provide practitioners and researchers with an overview of tools while also taking into consideration the present scenario in which digital tools are increasingly being employed in health and clinical settings. Furthermore, the purpose of this paper is to review the various observational methods of the parent-child relationship to assist future practitioners and researchers in the field in making an accurate assessment of caregiver-child interaction and selecting a valid tool for the early recognition of problematic relationships and identifying the most appropriate treatment modalities.

Indexed as

feedinginfant observationparent-child interactionreviewvideo recordings

Identifiers

PMID36553367
PMCPMC9776560
OpenAlexW4311862115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.