Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36553332›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Sympathy-Empathy and the Radicalization of Young People.

Nathalie Lavenne-Collot, Nolwenn Dissaux, Nicolas Campelo, Charlotte Villalon, Guillaume Bronsard, Michel Botbol, David Cohen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Nathalie Lavenne-CollotService de Psychiatrie de l'Enfant et de l'Adolescent, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Brest, 29200 Brest, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5674-1970
Nolwenn DissauxService de Psychiatrie de l'Enfant et de l'Adolescent, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Brest, 29200 Brest, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3690-6181
Nicolas CampeloService de Psychiatrie de l'Enfant et de l'Adolescent, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75006 Paris, France.
Charlotte VillalonService de Psychiatrie de l'Enfant et de l'Adolescent, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Brest, 29200 Brest, France.
Guillaume BronsardService de Psychiatrie de l'Enfant et de l'Adolescent, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Brest, 29200 Brest, France.
Michel BotbolFaculté de Médecine, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, 29200 Brest, France.
David CohenService de Psychiatrie de l'Enfant et de l'Adolescent, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75006 Paris, France.
Université de Bretagne Occidentale · FRCentre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInserm · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe sympathy-empathy (SE) system is commonly considered a key faculty implied in prosocial behaviors, and SE deficits (also called callous-unemotional traits, CUTs) are associated with nonprosocial and even violent behaviors. Thus, the first intuitive considerations considered a lack of SE among young people who undergo radicalization. Yet, their identification with a cause, their underlying feelings of injustice and grievance, and the other ways in which they may help communities, suggest that they may actually have a lot of empathy, even an excess of it. As a consequence, the links between SE and radicalization remain to be specified. This critical review aims to discuss whether and how SE is associated with developmental trajectories that lead young people to radicalization.

methodWe first recall the most recent findings about SE development, based on an interdisciplinary perspective informed by social neuroscience. Then, we review sociological and psychological studies that address radicalization. We will critically examine the intersections between SE and radicalization, including neuroscientific bases and anthropologic modulation of SE by social factors involved in radicalization.

resultsThis critical review indicates that the SE model should clearly distinguish between sympathy and empathy within the SE system. Using this model, we identified three possible trajectories in young radicalized individuals. In individuals with SE deficit, the legitimization of violence is enough to engage in radicalization. Concerning individuals with normal SE, we hypothesize two trajectories. First, based on SE inhibition/desensitization, individuals can temporarily join youths who lack empathy. Second, based on an SE dissociation, combining emotional sympathy increases for the in-group and cognitive empathy decreases toward the out-group.

conclusionsWhile confirming that a lack of empathy can favor radicalization, the counterintuitive hypothesis of a favorable SE development trajectory also needs to be considered to better specify the cognitive and affective aspects of this complex phenomenon.

Indexed as

adolescencecallous unemotional traitsempathyradicalizationviolent extremism

Identifiers

PMID36553332
PMCPMC9777530
OpenAlexW4311186226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.