ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Dysphagia Management in Children: Implementation and Perspectives of Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES).
Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perceived readiness of South African community service speech-language therapists to manage complex paediatric dysphagia.The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the Efficacy of Focal Vibration Therapy-Novafon as an Assistive Therapeutic Tool for Children With Feeding and Swallowing Disorders.Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dysphagia is any impairment of swallowing that compromises the safety, efficiency, or adequacy of nutritional or liquid intake. It is common in children, especially in some clinical populations, and may result in failure to thrive and respiratory problems due to pulmonary aspiration. Swallowing disorders have a severe impact on children's health, growth, and development, and on the quality of life of the child and family. Clinical evaluation cannot validly predict aspiration, which is mostly silent. A team management approach is advocated, including instrumental swallowing assessments. FEES has been proven to be safe and valid and is increasingly used in children of all ages. It allows the identification of structural abnormalities, assessment of the child's diet with real-life food and liquids while the child holds the optimal or preferred position, examination during breastfeeding, and assessment of fatigue and treatment strategies. FEES is carried out following a protocol that comprises three parts: the evaluation of the anatomical and physiological parameters of swallowing, testing of food and liquids of a range of different consistencies, and evaluation of treatment methods. Pediatric FEES involves adaptations for infants, and special considerations about readiness for nutritive trials and the infant's ability to sustain a coordinated feeding pattern. Varying consistencies and volumes of food or liquids are tried. Care of the dysphagic child involves team work. FEES, as a part of the assessment and management of dysphagia, enables the evaluation of the safety, efficiency, and adequacy of oral food and liquid intake. Future perspectives include standardized training in clinical FEES protocols to ensure clinical competency of the pediatric FESS team members and the development and validation of standardized examination and interpretation protocols for pediatric FEES.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.