Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36553239›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Triage Grading and Correct Diagnosis Are Critical for the Emergency Treatment of Anaphylaxis.

Arianna Dondi, Elisabetta Calamelli, Sara Scarpini, Egidio Candela, Giovanni Battista Biserni, Chiara Ghizzi, Francesca Lombardi, Paola Salvago, Laura Serra, Ilaria Corsini and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Arianna DondiPediatric Emergency Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7516-243X
Elisabetta CalamelliPediatric and Neonatology Unit, Imola Hospital, 40026 Imola, Bologna, Italy.
Sara ScarpiniSpecialty School of Pediatrics, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1094-8703
Egidio CandelaSpecialty School of Pediatrics, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Giovanni Battista BiserniSpecialty School of Pediatrics, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Chiara GhizziPediatric Unit, Maggiore Hospital, 40133 Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Francesca LombardiPediatric Unit, Maggiore Hospital, 40133 Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Paola SalvagoPediatric Unit, Maggiore Hospital, 40133 Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Laura SerraPediatric and Neonatology Unit, Imola Hospital, 40026 Imola, Bologna, Italy.
Ilaria CorsiniPediatric Emergency Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Marcello LanariPediatric Emergency Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Anaphylaxis is one of the most frequent and misdiagnosed emergencies in the pediatric emergency department (PED). We aimed to assess which factors play a major role for a correct diagnosis and an appropriate therapy. Methods: We reviewed the records of children discharged with a diagnosis of anaphylaxis or an allergic reaction over 11 years from 3 hospitals in the Bologna city area. Results: One hundred and sixteen cases matched the criteria (0.03% of the total admittances) and were divided according to the patients’ symptoms at arrival: active acute patients [AP], n = 50, or non-acute patients ([NAP], n = 66). At the patients’ discharge, anaphylaxis was diagnosed in 39 patients (33.6%). Some features seemed to favor a correct diagnosis: active symptoms at arrival (AP vs. NAP, p < 0.01), high-priority triage code (p < 0.01), and upper airway involvement (p < 0.01). Only 14 patients (12.1%), all in the AP group, received epinephrine, that was more likely administered to patients recognized to have anaphylaxis (p < 0.01) and with cardiovascular, respiratory, or persistent gastrointestinal symptoms (p < 0.02), as confirmed by logistic regression analysis. Conclusions: Anaphylaxis is still under-recognized and under-treated. Correct triage coding and a proper diagnosis seem to foster an appropriate treatment. Physicians often prefer third-line interventions. Specific training for nurses and physicians might improve the management of this disease.

Indexed as

anaphylaxisemergency serviceepinephrinehypersensitivity

Identifiers

PMID36553239
PMCPMC9776430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.