ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Automated Detection of Corneal Ulcer Using Combination Image Processing and Deep Learning.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Establishment of a corneal ulcer prognostic model based on machine learning.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Classification and Determination of Severity of Corneal Ulcer with Vision Transformer Based on the Analysis of Public Image Dataset of Fluorescein-Stained Corneas.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A corneal ulcers are one of the most common eye diseases. They come from various infections, such as bacteria, viruses, or parasites. They may lead to ocular morbidity and visual disability. Therefore, early detection can reduce the probability of reaching the visually impaired. One of the most common techniques exploited for corneal ulcer screening is slit-lamp images. This paper proposes two highly accurate automated systems to localize the corneal ulcer region. The designed approaches are image processing techniques with Hough transform and deep learning approaches. The two methods are validated and tested on the publicly available SUSTech-SYSU database. The accuracy is evaluated and compared between both systems. Both systems achieve an accuracy of more than 90%. However, the deep learning approach is more accurate than the traditional image processing techniques. It reaches 98.9% accuracy and Dice similarity 99.3%. However, the first method does not require parameters to optimize an explicit training model. The two approaches can perform well in the medical field. Moreover, the first model has more leverage than the deep learning model because the last one needs a large training dataset to build reliable software in clinics. Both proposed methods help physicians in corneal ulcer level assessment and improve treatment efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.