Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36553192›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Pharmacological Strategies and Further Measures for Pain Relief during Hysterosonosalpingography: A Systematic Review.

Arianna Riva, Amerigo Vitagliano, Marco Noventa, Giovanni Buzzaccarini, Gianluca Raffaello Damiani, Antonella Vimercati, Danila Morano, Cristina Taliento, Pantaleo Greco, Ettore Cicinelli and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Arianna RivaDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padua, Via Nicolò Giustiniani 3, 35128 Padua, Italy.
Amerigo VitaglianoUnit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), University of Bari, 70100 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2824-5435
Marco NoventaDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padua, Via Nicolò Giustiniani 3, 35128 Padua, Italy.
Giovanni BuzzaccariniDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padua, Via Nicolò Giustiniani 3, 35128 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9466-0178
Gianluca Raffaello DamianiUnit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), University of Bari, 70100 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0614-8068
Antonella VimercatiUnit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), University of Bari, 70100 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9862-1619
Danila MoranoDipartimento di Scienze Mediche, Università Degli Studi di Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.
Cristina TalientoDipartimento di Scienze Mediche, Università Degli Studi di Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0278-1202
Pantaleo GrecoDipartimento di Scienze Mediche, Università Degli Studi di Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.
Ettore CicinelliUnit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), University of Bari, 70100 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2390-4582
Gennaro ScutieroDipartimento di Scienze Mediche, Università Degli Studi di Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.
University of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Ferrara · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies for pain relief in women during contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the assessment of tubal patency and uterine disease, compared with placebo or no intervention. In December 2021, we searched the electronic databases (Pubmed, Embase, Sciencedirect, the Cochrane library and Clinicaltrials.gov) without date restriction: We identified 10 randomized control trials (RCTs) (2098 women) eligible for this systematic review, after applying our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Among these, five studies compared the use of painkillers with the placebo, two studies compared different catheter positions in the cervix or in the uterine cavity, and two others considered different temperatures of the contrast medium, as a method to reduce pain. Topical lidocaine applied before the procedure may be associated with effective pain relief during hysterosonography, though the quality of this evidence is low. New echogenic contrast agents and their temperature at 37 °C ensure a less painful procedure. There is insufficient evidence to draw conclusions on the efficacy of other analgesics or strategies.

Indexed as

anaesthesiaARThysterosonosalpingographyIVFpain relief

Identifiers

PMID36553192
PMCPMC9777723
OpenAlexW4312140369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.