ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy for Foraminal Stenosis in Spondylolisthesis: Two-Year Follow-Up Results.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Staged Full-endoscopic Foraminotomy for Multilevel Lumbar Stenosis with Scoliosis: A Case Report.NMC case report journal · 2026Article
- Postoperative Radiologic Changes in Early Recurrent Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis After Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy for Lower Lumbar Segments.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Endoscopic Foraminotomy for the Treatment of Lumbar Neuro-Foramen Stenosis: Role of CT in Treatment Planning and Post-Operative Assessment.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Uniportal Full-endoscopic Foraminotomy for Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis: Clinical Characteristics and Functional Outcomes.Orthopaedic surgery · 2024Article
- Future of Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Insights from Cutting-Edge Technology in the Industrial Field.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Risk Factors of Restenosis After Full Endoscopic Foraminotomy for Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis: Case-Control Study.Neurospine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Full-endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy (FELF) under local anesthesia has been developed as a minimally invasive alternative for lumbar foraminal stenosis. Some authors have described this technique for treating various lumbar spondylolisthesis. However, few studies have reported the outcomes of FELF for foraminal stenosis in patients with stable spondylolisthesis. This study aimed to demonstrate the specific technique and clinical outcomes of FELF for foraminal stenosis in patients with spondylolisthesis. Twenty-three consecutive patients with foraminal stenosis and stable spondylolisthesis were treated with FELF. Among them, 21 patients were followed up for 2 years. Full-endoscopic foraminal decompression via the transforaminal approach was performed by a senior surgeon. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog pain score (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and modified MacNab criteria. The VAS and ODI scores significantly improved at the two-year follow-up. The global effects were excellent in six patients (28.6%), good in 13 (61.9%), and fair in two (9.5%). Therefore, all patients showed clinical improvement, with a success (excellent/good) rate of 90.5%. No significant surgical complications or signs of further instability were observed. FELF can be used for foraminal stenosis in patients with stable spondylolisthesis. A specialized surgical technique is required for foraminal decompression of spondylolisthesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.