Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36553156›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Third-Generation High-Vision Ultrathin Endoscopy Using Texture and Color Enhancement Imaging and Narrow-Band Imaging to Evaluate Barrett's Esophagus.

Mitsushige Sugimoto, Yusuke Kawai, Yoshika Akimoto, Mariko Hamada, Eri Iwata, Masaki Murata, Hitomi Mizuno, Ryota Niikura, Naoyoshi Nagata, Masakatsu Fukuzawa and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Comparison of Texture and Color Enhancement Imaging with White Light Imaging in 52 Patients with Short-Segment Barrett's Esophagus.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mitsushige SugimotoDepartment of Gastroenterological Endoscopy, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9194-7392
Yusuke KawaiDepartment of Gastroenterological Endoscopy, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
Yoshika AkimotoDepartment of Gastroenterological Endoscopy, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
Mariko HamadaDepartment of Gastroenterological Endoscopy, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
Eri IwataDepartment of Gastroenterological Endoscopy, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
Masaki MurataDepartment of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto 612-8555, Japan.
Hitomi MizunoToyoda Aoba Clinic, Shizuoka 438-0821, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1535-5384
Ryota NiikuraDepartment of Gastroenterological Endoscopy, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5047-6195
Naoyoshi NagataDepartment of Gastroenterological Endoscopy, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
Masakatsu FukuzawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
Takao ItoiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
Takashi KawaiDepartment of Gastroenterological Endoscopy, Tokyo Medical University Hospital, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
Tokyo Medical University Hospital · JPKyoto Medical Center · JPToyoda Gosei (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It remains unclear whether texture- and color-enhancement imaging (TXI) and narrow-band imaging (NBI) provide an advantage over white-light imaging (WLI) in Barrett’s esophagus. We compared endoscopic findings and color differences between WLI and image-enhanced endoscopy (IEE) using a third-generation ultrathin endoscope. We retrospectively enrolled 40 patients who evaluated Barrett’s esophagus using WLI, TXI, and NBI. Color differences determined using the International Commission on Illumination 1976 (L∗, a∗, b∗) color space among Barrett’s epithelium, esophageal, and gastric mucosa were compared among the endoscopic findings. As the secondary outcome, we assessed the subjective visibility score among three kinds of endoscopic findings. The prevalence of Barrett’s esophagus and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in WLI was 82.5% and 47.5%, respectively, and similar among WLI, TXI, and NBI. Color differences between Barrett’s epithelium and esophageal or gastric mucosa on NBI were significantly greater than on WLI (all p < 0.05). However, the color difference between Barrett’s epithelium and esophageal mucosa was significantly greater on NBI than TXI (p < 0.001), and the visibility score of Barrett’s epithelium detection was significantly greater on TXI than NBI (p = 0.022), and WLI (p = 0.016). High-vision, third-generation ultrathin endoscopy using NBI and TXI is useful for evaluating Barrett’s epithelium and GERD compared with WLI alone.

Indexed as

Barrett’s esophagusnarrow-band imagingreflux esophagitistexture and color enhancement imagingultrathin endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID36553156
PMCPMC9777380
OpenAlexW4311365366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.