Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36553140›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Contextual Features and Information Bottleneck-Based Multi-Input Network for Breast Cancer Classification from Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography.

Xinmeng Li, Jia Cui, Jingqi Song, Mingyu Jia, Zhenxing Zou, Guocheng Ding, Yuanjie Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xinmeng LiSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7242-0125
Jia CuiSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China.
Jingqi SongSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China.
Mingyu JiaSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China.
Zhenxing ZouDepartment of Radiology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yantai 264001, China.
Guocheng DingDepartment of Radiology, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital, Yantai 264001, China.
Yuanjie ZhengSchool of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 61773246National Natural Science Foundation of China 81871508the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province ZR2018ZB0419the Taishan Scholar Project of Shandong Province TSHW201502038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In computer-aided diagnosis methods for breast cancer, deep learning has been shown to be an effective method to distinguish whether lesions are present in tissues. However, traditional methods only classify masses as benign or malignant, according to their presence or absence, without considering the contextual features between them and their adjacent tissues. Furthermore, for contrast-enhanced spectral mammography, the existing studies have only performed feature extraction on a single image per breast. In this paper, we propose a multi-input deep learning network for automatic breast cancer classification. Specifically, we simultaneously input four images of each breast with different feature information into the network. Then, we processed the feature maps in both horizontal and vertical directions, preserving the pixel-level contextual information within the neighborhood of the tumor during the pooling operation. Furthermore, we designed a novel loss function according to the information bottleneck theory to optimize our multi-input network and ensure that the common information in the multiple input images could be fully utilized. Our experiments on 488 images (256 benign and 232 malignant images) from 122 patients show that the method's accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and f1-score values are 0.8806, 0.8803, 0.8810, 0.8801, and 0.8806, respectively. The qualitative, quantitative, and ablation experiment results show that our method significantly improves the accuracy of breast cancer classification and reduces the false positive rate of diagnosis. It can reduce misdiagnosis rates and unnecessary biopsies, helping doctors determine accurate clinical diagnoses of breast cancer from multiple CESM images.

Indexed as

breast cancer classificationcontextual featurescontrast-enhanced spectral mammographydeep learninginformation bottleneck

Identifiers

PMID36553140
PMCPMC9777091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.