Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36553108›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Diagnostic Strategy for Suspected Pulmonary Embolism in Emergency Departments Based on the 4-Level Pulmonary Embolism Clinical Probability Score: Study Protocol of SPEED&PEPS Trial.

Pierre-Marie Roy, Thomas Moumneh, Andrea Penaloza, Jeannot Schmidt, Sandrine Charpentier, Luc-Marie Joly, Jérémie Riou, Delphine Douillet

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06015529 (Diagnostic Strategy for Suspected Pulmonary Embolism in Emergency Departments Based on the 4-Level Pulmonary Embolism Clinical Probability Score), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06015529 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Diagnostic Strategy for Suspected Pulmonary Embolism in Emergency Departments Based on the 4-Level Pulmonary Embolism Clinical Probability Score: SPEED&PEPS Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, AngersRan2023 to 2025Enrolled3,084ConditionsPulmonary EmbolismArms4PEPS strategy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pierre-Marie RoyAngers University Hospital, Emergency Department, Univ Angers, MitoVasc UMR CNRS 6015-INSERM 1083, FCRIN, INNOVTE, 49000 Angers, France.
Thomas MoumnehAngers University Hospital, Emergency Department, Univ Angers, MitoVasc UMR CNRS 6015-INSERM 1083, FCRIN, INNOVTE, 49000 Angers, France.
Andrea PenalozaCliniques Universitaires St-Luc, Emergency Department, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Bruxelles, Belgium.
Jeannot SchmidtClermont-Ferrand University Hospital-Gabriel Montpied, Emergency Department, FCRIN, INNOVTE, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3424-337X
Sandrine CharpentierToulouse University Hospital, Emergency Department, 31300 Toulouse, France.
Luc-Marie JolyRouen University Hospital, Emergency Department, 76031 Rouen, France.
Jérémie RiouAngers University Hospital, Methodology and Biostatistics Department, Delegation to Clinical Research and Innovation, Univ Angers, MINT UMR INSERM 1066-CNRS 6021, 49000 Angers, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7056-9257
Delphine DouilletAngers University Hospital, Emergency Department, Univ Angers, MitoVasc UMR CNRS 6015-INSERM 1083, FCRIN, INNOVTE, 49000 Angers, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

clinical probabilitycluster-randomized trialdiagnostic strategyover-testingpragmatic trialpulmonary embolismstudy protocol

Identifiers

PMID36553108
PMCPMC9777430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.