Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36553081›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Diagnostic Value of Oral Provocation Tests in Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions Induced by Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and Paracetamol.

Iwona Popiolek, Magdalena Blasiak, Aleksandra Kozak, Ewelina Pietak, Malgorzata Bulanda, Grzegorz Porebski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Iwona PopiolekDepartment of Toxicology and Environmental Diseases, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Jakubowskiego 2, 30-688 Krakow, Poland.
Magdalena BlasiakDepartment of Clinical and Environmental Allergology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, sw. Anny 12, 31-008 Krakow, Poland.
Aleksandra KozakDepartment of Clinical and Environmental Allergology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, sw. Anny 12, 31-008 Krakow, Poland.
Ewelina PietakDepartment of Clinical and Environmental Allergology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, sw. Anny 12, 31-008 Krakow, Poland.
Malgorzata BulandaDepartment of Clinical and Environmental Allergology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Botaniczna 3, 31-503 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6023-260X
Grzegorz PorebskiDepartment of Clinical and Environmental Allergology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Botaniczna 3, 31-503 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6146-0188

Funding

Jagiellonian University Medical College N41/DBS/000324
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral drug provocation tests (DPT) are the basic diagnostic tool for the detection of hypersensitivity to non-opioid analgesics and for selecting a safe alternative for a patient. They are of great practical importance due to their common use, but the data on the follow-up of patients after negative DPT are still very scarce. We examined the further fate of 164 such adult patients after negative NSAID or paracetamol tests and analyzed which excipients in the studied drugs they could be exposed to after the diagnostic workup. A structured medical interview was performed 32.9 months (mean) after the provocation tests. Of the 164 patients, 131 (79.9%) retook the tested drug and 12 developed another hypersensitivity reaction, giving the estimated negative predictive value of 90.8%. These reactions were induced by acetylsalicylic acid, paracetamol, meloxicam, and diclofenac, and were clinically similar to the initial ones (most commonly urticaria and angioedema). There are 93 generics of these drugs on the local market, containing a total of 33 excipients for which hypersensitivity reactions have been reported. All available generics contain such excipients. Thirty-one patients (20.1%) did not take the previously tested drug again, most often because it was not needed or because they were afraid of another reaction. DPT with analgesics has a high diagnostic performance. A minority of patients had relapsed after reexposure. One of the underestimated reasons for this may be drug excipients provoking a reaction, so it is advisable to use exactly the same medical product that has been negatively tested. Many patients avoid reexposure to a given drug, despite negative tests, therefore very reliable patient education in connection with DPT is highly needed.

Indexed as

acetaminophenadverse drug reactionsdrug hypersensitivitydrug safetyimmediate drug hypersensitivity reactionsnegative predictive valuenonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugsNSAIDsoral provocation testparacetamol

Identifiers

PMID36553081
PMCPMC9777020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.