Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36553076›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Potential Value of Visfatin, Omentin-1, Nesfatin-1 and Apelin in Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Sugania Malar Chinapayan, Shanggar Kuppusamy, Ning Yi Yap, Komathi Perumal, Glenda Gobe, Retnagowri Rajandram

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The role of nesfatin-1 in kidney diseases.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Genetic associations ofInternational journal of medical sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sugania Malar ChinapayanDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.
Shanggar KuppusamyDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.
Ning Yi YapLaboratory, Subang Jaya Medical Centre, Subang Jaya 47500, Malaysia.
Komathi Perumalepink Health Sdn Bhd, Shah Alam 40150, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0001-6573-3430
Glenda GobeNHMRC Chronic Kidney Disease Centre of Research Excellence, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4067, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8732-7908
Retnagowri RajandramDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia.
University of Malaya · MYSubang Jaya Medical Centre · MYTranslational Research Institute · AU

Funding

Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia (FRGS) No FP100-2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most lethal genitourinary malignancy. Obesity is a risk factor for RCC development. The role of adipokines in the relationship between obesity and RCC requires confirmatory evidence in the form of a systematic review and meta-analysis, specifically for visfatin, omentin-1, nesfatin-1 and apelin. A search of databases up to July 2022 (PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus) for studies reporting the association of these selected adipokines with RCC was conducted. A total of 13 studies fulfilled the selection criteria. Only visfatin (p < 0.05) and nesfatin-1 (p < 0.05) had a significant association with RCC. Meanwhile, apelin and omentin-1 showed no association with RCC. The meta-analysis results of nesfatin-1 showed no association with early-stage (OR = 0.09, 95% CI = −0.12−0.29, p = 0.41), late-stage (OR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.07−1.89, p = 0.23) and low-grade (OR = 1.75, 95% CI = 0.37−8.27, p = 0.48) RCC. However, nesfatin-1 showed an association with a high grade of the disease (OR = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.13−0.61, p = 0.001) and poorer overall survival (OS) (HR = 3.86, 95% CI = 2.18−6.85; p < 0.01). Apelin showed no association with the risk of RCC development (mean difference = 21.15, 95% CI = −23.69−65.99, p = 0.36) and OS (HR = 1.04, 95% Cl = 0.45−2.41; p = 0.92). Although the number of studies evaluated was limited, analysis from this systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that visfatin and nesfatin-1 were elevated. In summary, these adipokines may play a role in the development and progression of RCC and hence may have potential diagnostic and prognostic capabilities for RCC.

Indexed as

adipokinekidney cancermarkerobesityprognosis

Identifiers

PMID36553076
PMCPMC9776786
OpenAlexW4312140947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.