Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36553056›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models to Classify Artery Stenosis for Automated Generating Ultrasound Report.

Chih-Yang Yeh, Hsun-Hua Lee, Md Mohaimenul Islam, Chiu-Hui Chien, Suleman Atique, Lung Chan, Ming-Chin Lin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Chih-Yang YehGraduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.
Hsun-Hua LeeDepartment of Neurology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-1473-4799
Md Mohaimenul IslamInternational Center for Health Information Technology, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-6026-2748
Chiu-Hui ChienDivision of Operation Performance, Center for Management and Development, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.
Suleman AtiqueDepartment of Public Health Science, Faculty of Landscape and Society, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1430 Ås, Norway.
Lung ChanDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-5795-4460
Ming-Chin LinGraduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-9624-9705
Taipei Medical University · TWTaipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital · TWTaipei Medical University Hospital · TWUniversity of Ha'il · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Duplex ultrasonography (DUS) is a safe, non-invasive, and affordable primary screening tool to identify the vascular risk factors of stroke. The overall process of DUS examination involves a series of complex processes, such as identifying blood vessels, capturing the images of blood vessels, measuring the velocity of blood flow, and then physicians, according to the above information, determining the severity of artery stenosis for generating final ultrasound reports. Generation of transcranial doppler (TCD) and extracranial carotid doppler (ECCD) ultrasound reports involves a lot of manual review processes, which is time-consuming and makes it easy to make errors. Accurate classification of the severity of artery stenosis can provide an early opportunity for decision-making regarding the treatment of artery stenosis. Therefore, machine learning models were developed and validated for classifying artery stenosis severity based on hemodynamic features. This study collected data from all available cases and controlled at one academic teaching hospital in Taiwan between 1 June 2020, and 30 June 2020, from a university teaching hospital and reviewed all patients' medical records. Supervised machine learning models were developed to classify the severity of artery stenosis. The receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value were used for model performance evaluation. The performance of the random forest model was better compared to the logistic regression model. For ECCD reports, the accuracy of the random forest model to predict stenosis in various sites was between 0.85 and 1. For TCD reports, the overall accuracy of the random forest model to predict stenosis in various sites was between 0.67 and 0.86. The findings of our study suggest that a machine learning-based model accurately classifies artery stenosis, which indicates that the model has enormous potential to facilitate screening for artery stenosis.

Indexed as

artery stenosisextracranial carotid dopplermachine learningtranscranial dopplerultrasound report

Identifiers

PMID36553056
PMCPMC9776545
OpenAlexW4311533483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.