Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36553054›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Wearable Sensors and Artificial Intelligence for Physical Ergonomics: A Systematic Review of Literature.

Leandro Donisi, Giuseppe Cesarelli, Noemi Pisani, Alfonso Maria Ponsiglione, Carlo Ricciardi, Edda Capodaglio

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05777304 (Wearable Sensors and Machine Learning), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05777304 completednot on this map

Wearable Sensors and Machine Learning: a Technological Approach to Biomechanical Risk Assessment in Lifting Tasks

TypeobservationalSponsorIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpARan2010 to 2022Enrolled41ConditionsWearable DevicesArmswearable device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Lightweight and mobile artificial intelligence and immersive technologies in aviation.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Exploring Human-AI Dynamics in Enhancing Workplace Health and Safety: A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Leandro DonisiDepartment of Chemical, Materials and Production Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, 80125 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9746-2265
Giuseppe CesarelliDepartment of Chemical, Materials and Production Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, 80125 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8303-5900
Noemi PisaniDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2412-9058
Alfonso Maria PonsiglioneDepartment of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, 80125 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1346-515X
Carlo RicciardiIstituti Clinici Scientifici ICS Maugeri, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7290-6432
Edda CapodaglioIstituti Clinici Scientifici ICS Maugeri, 27100 Pavia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical ergonomics has established itself as a valid strategy for monitoring potential disorders related, for example, to working activities. Recently, in the field of physical ergonomics, several studies have also shown potential for improvement in experimental methods of ergonomic analysis, through the combined use of artificial intelligence, and wearable sensors. In this regard, this review intends to provide a first account of the investigations carried out using these combined methods, considering the period up to 2021. The method that combines the information obtained on the worker through physical sensors (IMU, accelerometer, gyroscope, etc.) or biopotential sensors (EMG, EEG, EKG/ECG), with the analysis through artificial intelligence systems (machine learning or deep learning), offers interesting perspectives from both diagnostic, prognostic, and preventive points of view. In particular, the signals, obtained from wearable sensors for the recognition and categorization of the postural and biomechanical load of the worker, can be processed to formulate interesting algorithms for applications in the preventive field (especially with respect to musculoskeletal disorders), and with high statistical power. For Ergonomics, but also for Occupational Medicine, these applications improve the knowledge of the limits of the human organism, helping in the definition of sustainability thresholds, and in the ergonomic design of environments, tools, and work organization. The growth prospects for this research area are the refinement of the procedures for the detection and processing of signals; the expansion of the study to assisted working methods (assistive robots, exoskeletons), and to categories of workers suffering from pathologies or disabilities; as well as the development of risk assessment systems that exceed those currently used in ergonomics in precision and agility.

Indexed as

biomechanical risk assessmentdeep learningergonomicshealth monitoringinertial measurement unitmachine learningoccupational medicinephysical ergonomicswearable sensorswork-related musculoskeletal disorders

Identifiers

PMID36553054
PMCPMC9776838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.