Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36553038›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Enhanced Diagnostics for Corneal Ectatic Diseases: The Whats, the Whys, and the Hows.

Louise Pellegrino Gomes Esporcatte, Marcella Q Salomão, Alexandre Batista da Costa Neto, Aydano P Machado, Bernardo T Lopes, Renato Ambrósio

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Evaluation of indices for the assessment and classification of keratoconus based on optical coherence tomography and Scheimpflug technology.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Keratoconus: imaging modalities and management.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Louise Pellegrino Gomes EsporcatteDepartment of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo 04023, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2353-9442
Marcella Q SalomãoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo 04023, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8330-6432
Alexandre Batista da Costa NetoBelo Horizonte Evangelical Hospital, Betin Unit, Belo Horizonte 30220-330, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6233-096X
Aydano P MachadoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo 04023, Brazil.
Bernardo T LopesDepartment of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo 04023, Brazil.
Renato AmbrósioDepartment of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo 04023, Brazil.
Instituto de Olhos de Goiânia · BRInstituto Benjamin Constant · BRUniversidade Federal de Alagoas · BRUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are different fundamental diagnostic strategies for patients with ectatic corneal diseases (ECDs): screening, confirmation of the diagnosis, classification of the type of ECD, severity staging, prognostic assessment, and clinical follow-up. The conscious application of such strategies enables individualized treatments. The need for improved diagnostics of ECD is related to the advent of therapeutic refractive procedures that are considered prior to keratoplasty. Among such less invasive procedures, we include corneal crosslinking, customized ablations, and intracorneal ring segment implantation. Besides the paradigm shift in managing patients with ECD, enhancing the sensitivity to detect very mild forms of disease, and characterizing the inherent susceptibility for ectasia progression, became relevant for identifying patients at higher risk for progressive iatrogenic ectasia after laser vision correction (LVC). Moreover, the hypothesis that mild keratoconus is a risk factor for delivering a baby with Down's syndrome potentially augments the relevance of the diagnostics of ECD. Multimodal refractive imaging involves different technologies, including Placido-disk corneal topography, Scheimpflug 3-D tomography, segmental or layered tomography with layered epithelial thickness using OCT (optical coherence tomography), and digital very high-frequency ultrasound (VHF-US), and ocular wavefront. Corneal biomechanical assessments and genetic and molecular biology tests have translated to clinical measurements. Artificial intelligence allows for the integration of a plethora of clinical data and has proven its relevance in facilitating clinical decisions, allowing personalized or individualized treatments.

Indexed as

corneal biomechanicscorneal ectasiageneticskeratoconusmultimodal corneal imaging

Identifiers

PMID36553038
PMCPMC9776904
OpenAlexW4311522755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.