ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Recognizing Atypical Presentations of Alzheimer's Disease: The Importance of CSF Biomarkers in Clinical Practice.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The clinical trials landscape of hydrocephalus: a scoping review of therapeutic priorities, innovation trends, and research gaps.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- [Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarker Profile in Atypical Alzheimer's Disease].Revista de neurologia · 2025Article
- Differentiating Progressive Supranuclear Palsy and Corticobasal Syndrome: Insights from Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers-A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Usefulness of Cerebrospinal Fluid Alzheimer's disease biomarkers in older patients: Evidence from a national multicenter prospective study.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025Article
- Cerebrospinal Fluid Classical Biomarker Levels in Mixed vs. Pure ABiomedicines · 2024Article
- Biomarker-Based Precision Therapy for Alzheimer's Disease: Multidimensional Evidence Leading a New Breakthrough in Personalized Medicine.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Review
- Controversial Past, Splendid Present, Unpredictable Future: A Brief Review of Alzheimer Disease History.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Besides the typical amnestic presentation, neuropathological studies indicate that Alzheimer's disease (AD) may present with atypical clinical pictures. The relative frequencies of typical and atypical or mixed presentations within the entire spectrum of AD remain unclear, while some mixed or atypical presentations may have not received adequate attention for them to be included in diagnostic criteria. We investigated the spectrum of clinical presentations in patients with the AD CSF biomarker profile (high tau and phospho-tau, low Aβ42 levels), hospitalized in a tertiary academic center. Among 98 patients with the CSF AD profile, 46% of patients had the typical presentation of "hippocampal" amnestic dementia. Additionally, 23.5% and 15.3% fulfilled the criteria of mixed or atypical presentations, respectively, as described in the IWG-2 criteria. The remaining 15.3% had unusual presentations, including non-logopenic (semantic and non-fluent agrammatic) primary progressive aphasia, corticobasal syndrome, and Richardson syndrome, or could be diagnosed with normal pressure hydrocephalus. Despite selection bias (academic center), atypical clinical presentations of AD may be more common than previously thought. CSF biomarkers seem to be a useful tool for antemortem identification of such patients, which is likely to affect therapeutic decisions. Some of the unusual presentations described above should be incorporated in diagnostic criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.