ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Urine and Saliva: Relevant Specimens for Malaria Diagnosis?
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Noninvasive malaria detection beyond blood sampling.Sensors & diagnostics · 2026Review
- Extraoral Detection of Biomarkers and Pathogens in Saliva: Comprehensive, Panoramic Review.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Multiplexed Isothermal Amplification Assay for the Detection ofACS omega · 2026Article
- Molecular Investigation of FIKK Kinase Family to Develop PCR-Based Diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum.Molecular biotechnology · 2025Article
- Voices from the Amazon: exploring implementor and user perceptions of non-invasive malaria diagnostics in Peru.Malaria journal · 2025Article
- Unveiling the Complex World of Extracellular Vesicles: Novel Characterization Techniques and Manufacturing Considerations.Chonnam medical journal · 2024Review
- Comparative Performance of Blood and Urine Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Tests in Detecting Malaria in Febrile Children: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.Sage open pediatricsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blood remains the specimen of preference for malaria diagnosis, whether it is for microscopic, nucleic acid-based or biomarker detection of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.