Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36552974›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

The Utility of Arterial Spin Labeling MRI in Medial Temporal Lobe as a Vascular Biomarker in Alzheimer's Disease Spectrum: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Efthymia Maria Kapasouri, Diomidis C Ioannidis, Donnie Cameron, Vassilios S Vassiliou, Michael Hornberger

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Cerebral Amyloid Deposition WithHuman brain mapping · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Time-encoded ASL reveals lower cerebral blood flow in the early AD continuum.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Efthymia Maria KapasouriCambridge University Hospitals, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
Diomidis C IoannidisCambridge University Hospitals, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
Donnie CameronNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7UQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9841-6909
Vassilios S VassiliouNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7UQ, UK.
Michael HornbergerNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7UQ, UK.
University of East Anglia · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We sought to systematically review and meta-analy the role of cerebral blood flow (CBF) in the medial temporal lobe (MTL) using arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging (ASL-MRI) and compare this in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD), individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and cognitively normal adults (CN). The prevalence of AD is increasing and leading to high healthcare costs. A potential biomarker that can identify people at risk of developing AD, whilst cognition is normal or only mildly affected, will enable risk-stratification and potential therapeutic interventions in the future. All studies investigated the role of CBF in the MTL and compared this among AD, MCI, and CN participants. A total of 26 studies were included in the systematic review and 11 in the meta-analysis. Three separate meta-analyses were conducted. Four studies compared CBF in the hippocampus of AD compared with the CN group and showed that AD participants had 2.8 mL/min/100 g lower perfusion compared with the CN group. Eight studies compared perfusion in the hippocampus of MCI vs. CN group, which showed no difference. Three studies compared perfusion in the MTL of MCI vs. CN participants and showed no statistically significant differences. CBF measured via ASL-MRI showed impairment in AD compared with the CN group in subregions of the MTL. CBF difference was significant in hippocampus between the AD and CN groups. However, MCI and CN group showed no significant difference in subregions of MTL.

Indexed as

arterial spin labelingASLcerebral blood flowdementiamedial temporal lobemild cognitive declineMRI

Identifiers

PMID36552974
PMCPMC9776573
OpenAlexW4310202184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.