Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36552965›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Role of Biomarkers in Periprosthetic Joint Infections.

Serhat Akcaalan, Halil Ibrahim Ozaslan, Ceyhun Caglar, Mehmet Emin Şimşek, Mustafa Citak, Mustafa Akkaya

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. CanIndian journal of orthopaedics · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Serhat AkcaalanKırıkkale Yuksek Ihtısas Hospital, Kırıkkale 71300, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-7350-6422
Halil Ibrahim OzaslanDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara 06010, Turkey.
Ceyhun CaglarDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara 06800, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-4286-7852
Mehmet Emin ŞimşekDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Lokman Hekim University, Ankara 06230, Turkey.
Mustafa CitakHelios ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, 22767 Hamburg, Germany.
Mustafa AkkayaDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara 06010, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-2694-4208

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most serious complications after joint arthroplasty. The incidence rate of PJI after total joint replacement is 1-3%. Although there are different guidelines and diagnostic criteria used to diagnose PJI, diagnosing PJI is a highly difficult process for orthopedists. The current Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria are widely used for the diagnosis of PJI. These criteria include results from blood/synovial fluid tests, physical examination, and histological and microbiological analyses of intra-operative samples. However, there is currently no blood or synovial test that can definitively diagnose PJI. To make a more effective diagnosis of PJI, a large number of studies have explored and continue to investigate biomarkers. This review aims to provide general information about serum and synovial markers used for the diagnosis of PJI that may be used to create a database to guide researchers in new studies.

Indexed as

biomarkerbloodperiprosthetic joint infectionsynovial fluid

Identifiers

PMID36552965
PMCPMC9777153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.