Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36552930›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Non-mass Breast Lesions: Could Multimodal Ultrasound Imaging Be Helpful for Their Diagnosis?

Wenjuan Guo, Tong Wang, Fan Li, Chao Jia, Siqi Zheng, Xuemei Zhang, Min Bai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wenjuan GuoDepartment of Ultrasound, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China.
Tong WangDepartment of Ultrasound, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China.
Fan LiDepartment of Ultrasound, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China.
Chao JiaDepartment of Ultrasound, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China.
Siqi ZhengDepartment of Ultrasound, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China.
Xuemei ZhangDepartment of Pathology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China.
Min BaiDepartment of Ultrasound, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China.
Shanghai First People's Hospital · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81671687
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To develop a prediction model for discriminating malignant from benign breast non-mass-like lesions (NMLs) using conventional ultrasound (US), strain elastography (SE) of US elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Methods: A total of 101 NMLs from 100 patients detected by conventional US were enrolled in this retrospective study. The characteristics of NMLs in conventional US, SE and CEUS were compared between malignant and benign NMLs. Histopathological results were used as the reference standard. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the independent risk factors. A multimodal method to evaluate NMLs based on logistic regression was developed. The diagnostic performance of conventional US, US + SE, US + CEUS and the combination of these modalities was evaluated and compared. Results: Among the 101 lesions, 50 (49.5%) were benign and 51 (50.5%) were malignant. Age ≥45 y, microcalcifications in the lesion, elasticity score >3, earlier enhancement time and hyper-enhancement were independent diagnostic indicators included to establish the multimodal prediction method. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of US + SE + CEUS was significantly higher than that of US (p < 0.0001) and US + SE (p < 0.0001), but there was no significant difference between the AUC of US + SE + CEUS and the AUC of US + CEUS (p = 0.216). Conclusion: US + SE + CEUS and US + CEUS could significantly improve the diagnostic efficiency and accuracy of conventional US in the diagnosis of NMLs.

Indexed as

contrast-enhanced ultrasoundelasticitymultimodal ultrasonic diagnosisnon-mass breast lesionsultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID36552930
PMCPMC9777234
OpenAlexW4310037113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.