ReviewCells2022
Visualizing the Genome: Experimental Approaches for Live-Cell Chromatin Imaging.
Review in Cells, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Drug Repositioning for MultiresistantACS omega · 2026Article
- A systematic guide for identifying transcription factors that directly regulate the expression of a gene of interest.Genome research · 2026Review
- Single-Molecule Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (smFISH) for RNA Localization Relative to a DNA Locus in Bacteria.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- A split luciferase biosensing platform for detection and imaging of chromatin loops in individual live cells.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Opticool: Cutting-edge transgenic optical tools.PLoS genetics · 2024Review
- CRISPR/Cas-Based Techniques for Live-Cell Imaging and Bioanalysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Live-cell imaging of chromatin contacts opens a new window into chromatin dynamics.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the years, our vision of the genome has changed from a linear molecule to that of a complex 3D structure that follows specific patterns and possesses a hierarchical organization. Currently, genomics is becoming "four-dimensional": our attention is increasingly focused on the study of chromatin dynamics over time, in the fourth dimension. Recent methods for visualizing the movements of chromatin loci in living cells by targeting fluorescent proteins can be divided into two groups. The first group requires the insertion of a special sequence into the locus of interest, to which proteins that recognize the sequence are recruited (e.g., FROS and ParB-INT methods). In the methods of the second approach, "programmed" proteins are targeted to the locus of interest (i.e., systems based on CRISPR/Cas, TALE, and zinc finger proteins). In the present review, we discuss these approaches, examine their strengths and weaknesses, and identify the key scientific problems that can be studied using these methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.