Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36552838›Full record

ArticleCells2022

Repair of Long Nerve Defects with a New Decellularized Nerve Graft in Rats and in Sheep.

Estefanía Contreras, Sara Traserra, Sara Bolívar, Joaquim Forés, Eduard Jose-Cunilleras, Felix García, Ignacio Delgado-Martínez, Sandra Holmgren, Raimund Strehl, Esther Udina and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. ComprehensiveFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Estefanía ContrerasDepartment of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Institute of Neuroscience, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8645-2790
Sara TraserraDepartment of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Institute of Neuroscience, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.
Sara BolívarDepartment of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Institute of Neuroscience, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2966-6845
Joaquim ForésDepartment of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Institute of Neuroscience, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.
Eduard Jose-CunillerasDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4536-7717
Felix GarcíaDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.
Ignacio Delgado-MartínezDepartment of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Institute of Neuroscience, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.
Sandra HolmgrenVERIGRAFT AB, Arvid Wallgrens Backe 20, 41346 Göteborg, Sweden.
Raimund StrehlVERIGRAFT AB, Arvid Wallgrens Backe 20, 41346 Göteborg, Sweden.
Esther UdinaDepartment of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Institute of Neuroscience, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1954-8562
Xavier NavarroDepartment of Cell Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Institute of Neuroscience, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9849-902X
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decellularized nerve allografts (DC) are an alternative to autografts (AG) for repairing severe peripheral nerve injuries. We have assessed a new DC provided by VERIGRAFT. The decellularization procedure completely removed cellularity while preserving the extracellular matrix. We first assessed the DC in a 15 mm gap in the sciatic nerve of rats, showing slightly delayed but effective regeneration. Then, we assayed the DC in a 70 mm gap in the peroneal nerve of sheep compared with AG. Evaluation of nerve regeneration and functional recovery was performed by clinical, electrophysiology and ultrasound tests. No significant differences were found in functional recovery between groups of sheep. Histology showed a preserved fascicular structure in the AG while in the DC grafts regenerated axons were grouped in small units. In conclusion, the DC was permissive for axonal regeneration and allowed to repair a 70 mm long gap in the sheep nerve.

Indexed as

Nerve TissueSciatic NerveAnimalsAutograftsNerve RegenerationRatsSheepTransplantation, AutologousTransplantation, Homologousallograftautograftdecellularizationnerve regenerationsheep

Identifiers

PMID36552838
PMCPMC9777287
OpenAlexW4312196371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.