Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36552810›Full record

ArticleCells2022

Generation of CD34

Léa Flippe, Anne Gaignerie, Céline Sérazin, Olivier Baron, Xavier Saulquin, Ignacio Anegon, Laurent David, Carole Guillonneau

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Léa FlippeNantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, UMR 1064, F-44000 Nantes, France.
Anne GaignerieNantes Université, CHU Nantes, Inserm, CNRS, BioCore, 44035 Nantes, France.
Céline SérazinNantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, UMR 1064, F-44000 Nantes, France.
Olivier BaronDépartement de Chirurgie Cardiaque Pédiatrique, CHU Nantes, 44093 Nantes, France.
Xavier SaulquinNantes Université, Inserm, CNRS, CRCI2NA, 44035 Nantes, France.
Ignacio AnegonNantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, UMR 1064, F-44000 Nantes, France.
Laurent DavidNantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, UMR 1064, F-44000 Nantes, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3594-0353
Carole GuillonneauNantes Université, INSERM, Center for Research in Transplantation and Translational Immunology, UMR 1064, F-44000 Nantes, France.
Inserm · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapy using primary T cells has revolutionized medical care in some pathologies in recent years, but limitations associated to challenging cell genome edition, insufficient cell number production, the use of only autologous cells, and the lack of product standardization have limited its clinical use. The alternative use of T cells generated in vitro from human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) offers great advantages by providing a self-renewing source of T cells that can be readily genetically modified and facilitate the use of standardized universal off-the-shelf allogeneic cell products and rapid clinical access. However, despite their potential, a better understanding of the feasibility and functionality of T cells differentiated from hPSCs is necessary before moving into clinical settings. In this study, we generated human-induced pluripotent stem cells from T cells (T-iPSCs), allowing for the preservation of already recombined TCR, with the same properties as human embryonic stem cells (hESCs). Based on these cells, we differentiated, with high efficiency, hematopoietic progenitor stem cells (HPSCs) capable of self-renewal and differentiation into any cell blood type, in addition to DN3a thymic progenitors from several T-iPSC lines. In order to better comprehend the differentiation, we analyzed the transcriptomic profiles of the different cell types and demonstrated that HPSCs differentiated from hiPSCs had very similar profiles to cord blood hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). Furthermore, differentiated T-cell progenitors had a similar profile to thymocytes at the DN3a stage of thymic lymphopoiesis. Therefore, utilizing this approach, we were able to regenerate precursors of therapeutic human T cells in order to potentially treat a wide range of diseases.

Indexed as

Induced Pluripotent Stem CellsPluripotent Stem CellsAntigens, CD34Cell Adhesion MoleculesHematopoietic Stem CellsHumansThymocytesAntigens, CD34Cell Adhesion Moleculeshematopoietic differentiationhematopoietic progenitorhESChiPSCT-cell progenitor

Identifiers

PMID36552810
PMCPMC9777438
OpenAlexW4311398666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.