Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36552761›Full record

ArticleCells2022

Novel Tuning of PMMA Orthopedic Bone Cement Using TBB Initiator: Effect of Bone Cement Extracts on Bioactivity of Osteoblasts and Osteoclasts.

Keiji Komatsu, Kosuke Hamajima, Ryotaro Ozawa, Hiroaki Kitajima, Takanori Matsuura, Takahiro Ogawa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. How Emerging Nanomaterials are Effective in Bone Regeneration?International journal of nanomedicine · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Keiji KomatsuWeintraub Center for Reconstructive Biotechnology, School of Dentistry, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7659-1965
Kosuke HamajimaWeintraub Center for Reconstructive Biotechnology, School of Dentistry, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.
Ryotaro OzawaWeintraub Center for Reconstructive Biotechnology, School of Dentistry, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.
Hiroaki KitajimaWeintraub Center for Reconstructive Biotechnology, School of Dentistry, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.
Takanori MatsuuraWeintraub Center for Reconstructive Biotechnology, School of Dentistry, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7539-1227
Takahiro OgawaWeintraub Center for Reconstructive Biotechnology, School of Dentistry, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA.
University of California, Los Angeles · USTokyo Medical and Dental University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone cement containing benzoyl peroxide (BPO) as a polymerization initiator are commonly used to fix orthopedic metal implants. However, toxic complications caused by bone cement are a clinically significant problem. Poly (methyl methacrylate) tri-n-butylborane (PMMA-TBB), a newly developed material containing TBB as a polymerization initiator, was found to be more biocompatible than conventional PMMA-BPO bone cements due to reduced free radical generation during polymerization. However, free radicals might not be the only determinant of cytotoxicity. Here, we evaluated the response and functional phenotypes of cells exposed to extracts derived from different bone cements. Bone cement extracts were prepared from two commercial PMMA-BPO cements and an experimental PMMA-TBB. Rat bone marrow-derived osteoblasts and osteoclasts were cultured in a medium supplemented with bone cement extracts. More osteoblasts survived and attached to the culture dish with PMMA-TBB extract than in the culture with PMMA-BPO extracts. Osteoblast proliferation and differentiation were higher in the culture with PMMA-TBB extract. The number of TRAP-positive multinucleated cells was significantly lower in the culture with PMMA-TBB extract. There was no difference in osteoclast-related gene expression in response to different bone cement extracts. In conclusion, PMMA-TBB extract was less toxic to osteoblasts than PMMA-BPO extracts. Although extracts from the different cement types did not affect osteoclast function, PMMA-TBB extract seemed to reduce osteoclastogenesis, a possible further advantage of PMMA-TBB cement. These implied that the reduced radical generation during polymerization is not the only determinant for the improved biocompatibility of PMMA-TBB and that the post-polymerization chemical elution may also be important.

Indexed as

Bone CementsPolymethyl MethacrylateAnimalsMaterials TestingOsteoblastsOsteoclastsRatsBone CementsPolymethyl Methacrylatearthroplastybenzoyl peroxidecytotoxicityimplantpoly(methyl methacrylate)total hip replacementtri-n-butylborane

Identifiers

PMID36552761
PMCPMC9776632
OpenAlexW4312125522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.