Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36552721›Full record

ReviewCells2022

Human In Vitro Models of Epilepsy Using Embryonic and Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Muhammad Shahid Javaid, Tracie Tan, Naomi Dvir, Alison Anderson, Terence J O'Brien, Patrick Kwan, Ana Antonic-Baker

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Muhammad Shahid JavaidDepartment of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2146-5566
Tracie TanDepartment of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1638-7129
Naomi DvirDepartment of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.
Alison AndersonDepartment of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.
Terence J O'BrienDepartment of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.
Patrick KwanDepartment of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.
Ana Antonic-BakerDepartment of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.
Monash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The challenges in making animal models of complex human epilepsy phenotypes with varied aetiology highlights the need to develop alternative disease models that can address the limitations of animal models by effectively recapitulating human pathophysiology. The advances in stem cell technology provide an opportunity to use human iPSCs to make disease-in-a-dish models. The focus of this review is to report the current information and progress in the generation of epileptic patient-specific iPSCs lines, isogenic control cell lines, and neuronal models. These in vitro models can be used to study the underlying pathological mechanisms of epilepsies, anti-seizure medication resistance, and can also be used for drug testing and drug screening with their isogenic control cell lines.

Indexed as

EpilepsyInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsAnimalsHumansepilepsyneuronal differentiationpatient-specific cell modelspersonalised disease modelspersonalised medicinestem cell lines

Identifiers

PMID36552721
PMCPMC9776452
OpenAlexW4311852691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.