Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36552489›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Informing Implementation: Perspectives from the Australian University Community Regarding an Animal Assisted Intervention.

Emily Cooke, Claire Henderson-Wilson, Elyse Warner, Anthony D LaMontagne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emily CookeSchool of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5406-1795
Claire Henderson-WilsonSchool of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia.
Elyse WarnerSchool of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia.
Anthony D LaMontagneSchool of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5811-5906

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal Assisted Interventions (AAIs) have become increasingly popular in the university setting; however, there is limited research exploring their potential on an Australian university campus and participants' views prior to implementation. Therefore, this study aimed to explore university staff members' and students' interest in participating in an AAI and their perspectives on intervention characteristics. This was a mixed methods study, using an online survey and semi-structured interviews. The survey had 344 responses, and 45 interviews were conducted. A large majority of participants (86%) were interested in participating in an AAI. In the survey, participants indicated their preferred intervention characteristics for the location of the intervention, frequency of participating, and ways of hearing about the intervention. Participants also expressed concerns regarding therapy animal welfare. In interviews, participants discussed various considerations which may impact the intervention (such as the accessibility of the location, the impact of workload on participating, the effectiveness of promotion strategies, and factors that may assist therapy animal welfare, such as the therapy animals' handlers). Gaining an insight into the university community's views prior to implementation may ensure the intervention is feasible to implement and can be beneficial to both humans and therapy animals.

Indexed as

animal assisted interventionimplementation researchuniversity staff membersuniversity students

Identifiers

PMID36552489
PMCPMC9774916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.