Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36552374›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

María de Los Angeles Ramo, Alfredo A Benito, Joaquín Quílez, Luis V Monteagudo, Cristina Baselga, María Teresa Tejedor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Molecular detection ofVeterinary and animal science · 2026
    Article
  3. First report ofOpen veterinary journal · 2026
    Article
  4. Molecular characterization ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Seroprevalence and Risk Factors Associated withAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Two Years afterAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

María de Los Angeles RamoDepartment of Animal Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Zaragoza, Miguel Servet 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain.
Alfredo A BenitoEXOPOL S.L, Pol Rio Gállego D/14, San Mateo del Gállego, 50840 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2497-9028
Joaquín QuílezDepartment of Animal Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Zaragoza, Miguel Servet 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7831-2483
Luis V MonteagudoAgrifood Institute of Aragón (IA2), University of Zaragoza-CITA, Miguel Servet 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0210-2919
Cristina BaselgaEXOPOL S.L, Pol Rio Gállego D/14, San Mateo del Gállego, 50840 Zaragoza, Spain.
María Teresa TejedorDepartment of Anatomy, Embryology and Genetics, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Zaragoza, Miguel Servet 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5026-5144
Universidad de Zaragoza · ESServicio Gallego de Salud · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coxiella burnetii is an intracellular bacterium causing human Q fever and reproductive disorders in domestic ruminants. We analyzed the occurrence of C. burnetii and co-infections with six other major pathogens causing abortion in sheep (1242 cases) and goat (371 cases) flocks from Spain and Portugal. After real-time PCR detection, co-infections were established by principal component and cluster analysis that grouped cases based on the joint presence/absence of several microorganisms. C. burnetii and Chlamydia abortus were the most common abortifacient agents with approximately 75% of cases from both hosts testing positive, followed by Toxoplasma gondii, Campylobacter sp., Salmonella enterica, border disease virus and Neospora caninum. C. burnetii was significantly more common than C. abortus in goat abortions (p < 0.001). Co-infections with at least two pathogens were found in more than 66% cases of ovine abortions and 36% cases of caprine abortions testing positive for C. burnetii, mostly including mixed infections with only C. abortus. These findings indicate that both pathogens are the most significant ones to be readily prevented by vaccination in this geographical area. Biosecurity and biocontainment measures are also steadfastly recommended to prevent both the economic losses and public health risks associated with most of these abortifacient agents.

Indexed as

abortionco-infectionsCoxiella burnetiiIberian Peninsulasmall ruminantsvaccine

Identifiers

PMID36552374
PMCPMC9774532
OpenAlexW4311855931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.