ArticleBiology2022
KRS-Net: A Classification Approach Based on Deep Learning for Koi with High Similarity.
Article in Biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A review of deep learning methods in aquatic animal husbandry.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As the traditional manual classification method has some shortcomings, including high subjectivity, low efficiency, and high misclassification rate, we studied an approach for classifying koi varieties. The main contributions of this study are twofold: (1) a dataset was established for thirteen kinds of koi; (2) a classification problem with high similarity was designed for underwater animals, and a KRS-Net classification network was constructed based on deep learning, which could solve the problem of low accuracy for some varieties that are highly similar. The test experiment of KRS-Net was carried out on the established dataset, and the results were compared with those of five mainstream classification networks (AlexNet, VGG16, GoogLeNet, ResNet101, and DenseNet201). The experimental results showed that the classification test accuracy of KRS-Net reached 97.90% for koi, which is better than those of the comparison networks. The main advantages of the proposed approach include reduced number of parameters and improved accuracy. This study provides an effective approach for the intelligent classification of koi, and it has guiding significance for the classification of other organisms with high similarity among classes. The proposed approach can be applied to some other tasks, such as screening, breeding, and grade sorting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.