Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36552188›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2022

Aβ42 as a Biomarker of Alzheimer's Disease: Is Saliva a Viable Alternative to Cerebrospinal Fluid?

Silvia Boschi, Fausto Roveta, Alberto Grassini, Andrea Marcinnò, Aurora Cermelli, Fabio Ferrandes, Innocenzo Rainero, Elisa Rubino

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diagnostic performance of salivary markers of Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. An Update of Salivary Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Silvia BoschiDepartment of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1610-1917
Fausto RovetaDepartment of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Alberto GrassiniDepartment of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Andrea MarcinnòDepartment of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Aurora CermelliDepartment of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9753-9288
Fabio FerrandesDepartment of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2281-0149
Innocenzo RaineroDepartment of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6074-9628
Elisa RubinoDepartment of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy.
University of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of reliable biomarkers in biological fluids is paramount to optimizing the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Measurement of Aβ42, t-tau, and p-tau in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is the most accepted method to support the diagnosis of AD. However, lumbar puncture represents an invasive investigation, whereas saliva is one of the most accessible body fluids. The aim of our study was to investigate salivary concentrations in AD and evaluate the correlation between salivary and CSF Aβ42 concentrations in AD patients, patients with non-AD dementias, and controls. We recruited 100 subjects: 18 AD patients, 64 patients with non-AD dementias, and 18 controls. The mean saliva Aβ42 concentrations in AD patients were higher than in controls (p < 0.001), and to patients with non-AD dementias (p = 0.001). A significant negative correlation between salivary and CSF Aβ42 concentrations was found in the overall group (r = −0.562, p < 0.001) and in non-AD patients (r = −0.443, p < 0.001). Salivary Aβ42 concentrations positively correlated with CSF t-tau (r = 0.321, p = 0.001) and p-tau (r = 0.297, p = 0.001). Our study showed that in AD patients’ saliva, Aβ42 concentrations are specifically increased, and we found an interesting negative correlation between CSF and salivary Aβ42 concentrations that warrants further investigation.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseasebeta amyloid 42biomarkersCSFsaliva

Identifiers

PMID36552188
PMCPMC9775629
OpenAlexW4312140517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.