Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36552186›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2022

Review of the Treatments for Central Neuropathic Pain.

Breanna L Sheldon, Zachary T Olmsted, Shelby Sabourin, Ehsaun Heydari, Tessa A Harland, Julie G Pilitsis

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pain syndromes in Parkinson's disease: an update for general practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Breanna L SheldonDepartment of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY 12208, USA.
Zachary T OlmstedDepartment of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY 12208, USA.
Shelby SabourinDepartment of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY 12208, USA.
Ehsaun HeydariDepartment of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY 12208, USA.
Tessa A HarlandDepartment of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY 12208, USA.
Julie G PilitsisDepartment of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY 12208, USA.
Albany Medical Center Hospital · USFlorida Atlantic University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Central neuropathic pain (CNP) affects millions worldwide, with an estimated prevalence of around 10% globally. Although there are a wide variety of treatment options available, due to the complex and multidimensional nature in which CNP arises and presents symptomatically, many patients still experience painful symptoms. Pharmaceutical, surgical, non-invasive, cognitive and combination treatment options offer a generalized starting point for alleviating symptoms; however, a more customized approach may provide greater benefit. Here, we comment on the current treatment options that exist for CNP and further suggest the need for additional research regarding the use of biomarkers to help individualize treatment options for patients.

Indexed as

central neuropathic pain (CNP)pharmacological treatmentsurgical treatment

Identifiers

PMID36552186
PMCPMC9775950
OpenAlexW4312140812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.