Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36552119›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2022

Parsers and Grammars: A Tutorial Overview from the Linguistics Building.

Carlos Acuña-Fariña

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Carlos Acuña-FariñaDepartment of English and German, Faculty of Philology, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, 15705 Coruña, Spain.

Funding

Axencia Galega de Innovación and Consellería de Economía, Industria e Innovación, Xunta de Galicia ED431B 2019/2020; ED431B 2022/19Consellería de Cultura, Educación e Ordenación Universitaria, Xunta de Galicia ED481B-2022-041the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación PID2019-110583GB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to re-examine the relationship between grammars and processing systems in light of the various forms of experimental research (especially of an electrophysiological nature) that has been conducted in the last fifteen years or so. First, the notion of 'processing strategy' or 'heuristics processing' is considered followed by a discussion of structures of great morphosyntactic complexity that parsing systems seem to tackle by simply respecting complex grammatical laws, instead of by resorting to shortcuts. Then, grammatical illusions and what these can teach us about the processing of grammar are considered. It is argued that illusions allow us to discern a few explanatory principles that may redefine the way we see parser-grammar relations. Among these is the idea that how long illusions last in the online-to-offline transition depends in part on their 'templatability', that is, the ease with which they become gestaltic templates. Another key idea is that some apparent illusions are in fact nothing more than grammar contemplated at work as in slow motion.

Indexed as

grammarsgrammatical illusionheuristicsparsersstrategytemplate

Identifiers

PMID36552119
PMCPMC9775380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.