Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36552092›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2022

EPIAMNE: A New Scoring System for Differentiating Transient EPIleptic AMNEsia from Transient Global Amnesia.

Biagio Maria Sancetta, Lorenzo Ricci, Giovanni Assenza, Marilisa Boscarino, Flavia Narducci, Carlo Vico, Vincenzo Di Lazzaro, Mario Tombini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Biagio Maria SancettaNeurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology Unit, Department of Medicine, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy.
Lorenzo RicciNeurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology Unit, Department of Medicine, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3668-469X
Giovanni AssenzaNeurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology Unit, Department of Medicine, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy.
Marilisa BoscarinoNeurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology Unit, Department of Medicine, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy.
Flavia NarducciNeurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology Unit, Department of Medicine, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy.
Carlo VicoNeurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology Unit, Department of Medicine, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy.
Vincenzo Di LazzaroNeurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology Unit, Department of Medicine, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9113-5925
Mario TombiniNeurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology Unit, Department of Medicine, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, 00128 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0328-7815
Università Campus Bio-Medico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transient epileptic amnesia (TEA) is a rare cause of acute amnestic syndromes (AAS), often misdiagnosed as transient global amnesia (TGA). We proposed a scoring system—the EPIlepsy AMNEsia (EPIAMNE) score—using quantitative EEG (qEEG) analysis to obtain a tool for differentiating TEA from TGA. We retrospectively reviewed clinical information and standard EEGs (stEEG) of 19 patients with TEA and 21 with TGA. We computed and compared Power Spectral Density, demonstrating an increased relative theta power in TGA. We subsequently incorporated qEEG features in EPIAMNE score, together with clinical and stEEG features. ROC curve models and pairwise ROC curve comparison were used to evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy for TEA detection of EPIAMNE score, presence of symptoms atypical for TGA (pSymAT) and identification of anomalies (interictal epileptiform or temporal focal spiky transients) at stEEG (PosEEG). Area Under the Curve (AUC) of EPIAMNE score revealed to be higher than PosEEG and pSymAT (AUCEPIAMNE = 0.95, AUCpSymAT = 0.85, AUCPosEEG = 0.67) and this superiority proved to be statistically significant (p-valueEPIAMNE-PosEEG and p-valueEPIAMNE-pSymAT < 0.05). In conclusion, EPIAMNE score classified TEA with higher accuracy than PosEEG and pSymAT. This approach could become a promising tool for the differential diagnosis of AAS, especially for early TEA detection.

Indexed as

acute amnestic syndromesquantitative EEG analysistransient epileptic amnesia

Identifiers

PMID36552092
PMCPMC9775429
OpenAlexW4310189298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.