Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36552012›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2022

The Importance of Pore-Forming Toxins in Multiple Organ Injury and Dysfunction.

Simon T Abrams, Lijun Wang, Jun Yong, Qian Yu, Min Du, Yasir Alhamdi, Zhenxing Cheng, Caroline Dart, Steven Lane, Weiping Yu and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Disseminated intravascular coagulation.Journal of intensive care · 2025
    Review
  4. Trauma-toxicology: concepts, causes, complications.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Simon T AbramsDepartment of Clinical Infection, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7BE, UK.
Lijun WangThe Medical School, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0208-0273
Jun YongDepartment of Clinical Infection, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7BE, UK.
Qian YuThe Medical School, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China.
Min DuDepartment of Clinical Infection, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7BE, UK.
Yasir AlhamdiDepartment of Clinical Infection, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7BE, UK.
Zhenxing ChengDepartment of Clinical Infection, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7BE, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0847-2582
Caroline DartInstitute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZB, UK.
Steven LaneInstitute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L7YB, UK.
Weiping YuThe Medical School, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China.
Cheng-Hock TohDepartment of Clinical Infection, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7BE, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9708-8883
Guozheng WangDepartment of Clinical Infection, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7BE, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5525-3548
University of Liverpool · GBSoutheast University · CN

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/14/19/30751British Heart Foundation (PG/14/19/30751 and PG/16/65/32313)British Heart Foundation PG/16/65/32313
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple organ injury and dysfunction often occurs in acute critical illness and adversely affects survival. However, in patients who survive, organ function usually recovers without permanent damage. It is, therefore, likely that there are reversible mechanisms, but this is poorly understood in the pathogenesis of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS).

aimsBased on our knowledge of extracellular histones and pneumolysin, as endogenous and exogenous pore-forming toxins, respectively, here we clarify if the extent of cell membrane disruption and recovery is important in MODS.

methodsThis is a combination of retrospective clinical studies of a cohort of 98 patients from an intensive care unit (ICU) in a tertiary hospital, with interventional animal models and laboratory investigation.

resultsIn patients without septic shock and/or disseminate intravascular coagulation (DIC), circulating histones also strongly correlated with sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores, suggesting their pore-forming property might play an important role. In vivo, histones or pneumolysin infusion similarly caused significant elevation of cell damage markers and multiple organ injury. In trauma and sepsis models, circulating histones strongly correlated with these markers, and anti-histone reagents significantly reduced their release. Comparison of pneumolysin deletion and its parental strain-induced sepsis mouse model showed that pneumolysin was not essential for sepsis development, but enhanced multiple organ damage and reduced survival time. In vitro, histones and pneumolysin treatment disrupt cell membrane integrity, resulting in changes in whole-cell currents and elevated intracellular Ca

conclusionThis work has confirmed the importance of pore-forming toxins in the development of MODS and proposed a potential mechanism to explain the reversibility of MODS. This may form the foundation for the development of effective therapies.

Indexed as

cell membrane integrityextracellular histonesmultiple organ dysfunction syndromemultiple organ injurypneumolysinpore-forming toxinsepsis

Identifiers

PMID36552012
PMCPMC9776026
OpenAlexW4312140933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.