ArticleBiomedicines2022
Long-Term Safety of Antifibrotic Drugs in IPF: A Real-World Experience.
Article in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Real-world safety and effectiveness of pirfenidone and nintedanib in the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Phase I, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Investigating the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of BS1801 in Healthy Chinese Adult Subjects.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- Bexotegrast Shows Dose-Dependent Integrin αAnnals of the American Thoracic Society · 2025Trial
- Clinical course of mild-to-moderate idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis during therapy with pirfenidone: Results of the non-interventional study AERplus.Pneumologie (Stuttgart, Germany) · 2024Trial
- Harmine Derivative H-2-104 Alleviates Echinococcus granulosus-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis in Mice by Inhibiting Fibroblast Activation and Inducing DNA Damage.Journal of immunology research · 2026Article
- Progress in the Application of Pirfenidone in Post-COVID-19 Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Maintenance of Effectiveness of Pirfenidone in Elderly Patients with Progressive Functional Impairment: A Real-World Retrospective Study in IPF.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Article
- Survival impact and safety comparison of pirfenidone and nintedanib for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A meta-analysis.Sarcoidosis, vasculitis, and diffuse lung diseases : official journal of WASOG · 2025Article
- Real-world insights into safety, tolerability, and predictive factors of adverse drug reactions in treating idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with pirfenidone and nintedanib.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2025Article
- Pharmacological Treatment of Interstitial Lung Diseases: A Novel Landscape for Inhaled Agents.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Pirfenidone and Nintedanib in Pulmonary Fibrosis: Lights and Shadows.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Antifibrotic treatment adherence, efficacy and outcomes for patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in Spain: a real-world evidence study.BMJ open respiratory research · 2024Observational
- Use of pirfenidone in fibrotic interstitial lung diseases and beyond: a review.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- A Real-World Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study on Polish Experience with Nintedanib Therapy in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: The PolExNIB Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pirfenidone and nintedanib are the only two drugs approved for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Both proved to be safe and well-tolerated in clinical trials, but real-world data and direct comparisons are scarce. This real-life study explored the safety profile of pirfenidone and nintedanib with a prolonged follow-up. We retrospectively collected clinical status, adverse events (AEs), and treatment changes from IPF patients who had started an antifibrotic treatment at our centre from December 2011 to December 2020, including 192 patients treated with pirfenidone and 89 with nintedanib. The majority of patients in both groups experienced one or more AEs during the follow-up. A higher proportion of AEs in the nintedanib group were effectively treated with behavioural modifications or additional medications compared with the pirfenidone group (52.5% vs. 40.6%,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.