Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36551871›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2022

Liquid Biopsy in Diagnosis and Prognosis of Non-Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Alexey S Rzhevskiy, Alina Y Kapitannikova, Denis V Butnaru, Evgeniy V Shpot, Simon A Joosse, Andrei V Zvyagin, Majid Ebrahimi Warkiani

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Liquid biopsy to personalize treatment for metastatic prostate cancer.American journal of translational research · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Alexey S RzhevskiyInstitute of Molecular Theranostics, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4042-7813
Alina Y KapitannikovaInstitute of Molecular Theranostics, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Denis V ButnaruInstitute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Evgeniy V ShpotInstitute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Simon A JoosseDepartment of Tumor Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4296-5615
Andrei V ZvyaginInstitute of Molecular Theranostics, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-8799-2257
Majid Ebrahimi WarkianiInstitute of Molecular Theranostics, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Sechenov University · RUNational Research University Higher School of Economics · RUUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, sensitive and specific methods for the detection and prognosis of early stage PCa are lacking. To establish the diagnosis and further identify an appropriate treatment strategy, prostate specific antigen (PSA) blood test followed by tissue biopsy have to be performed. The combination of tests is justified by the lack of a highly sensitive, specific, and safe single test. Tissue biopsy is specific but invasive and may have severe side effects, and therefore is inappropriate for screening of the disease. At the same time, the PSA blood test, which is conventionally used for PCa screening, has low specificity and may be elevated in the case of noncancerous prostate tumors and inflammatory conditions, including benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatitis. Thus, diverse techniques of liquid biopsy have been investigated to supplement or replace the existing tests of prostate cancer early diagnosis and prognostics. Here, we provide a review on the advances in diagnosis and prognostics of non-metastatic prostate cancer by means of various biomarkers extracted via liquid biopsy, including circulating tumor cells, exosomal miRNAs, and circulating DNAs.

Indexed as

cfDNAcirculating tumor cellsctDNAexosomesliquid biopsymiRNAprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID36551871
PMCPMC9776104
OpenAlexW4311527952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.