ArticleBiomedicines2022
Evaluation of the Efficacy of a Combined Treatment Using the mTOR-Inhibitor Everolimus and [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE in Nude CD1 Mice with SSTR-Expressing Pancreatic AR42J Xenograft Tumors.
Article in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- A case report: enhanced somatostatin receptor expression in metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor following everolimus therapy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Therapy options for advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) include the mTOR inhibitor everolimus and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE, however further optimization in the therapeutic landscape is required as response rates are still low. In this study, we investigated the synergistic and potentially enhanced efficacy of a combined treatment with everolimus and [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE in a mouse model. Baseline [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET scans were obtained five days after athymic CD1 mice were inoculated with AR42J tumor cells, before separating the animals into four groups. Group 1 received a placebo, group 2 everolimus, group 3 a placebo and PRRT, and group 4 everolimus and PRRT. The treatment response was monitored by manually measuring the tumor volumes (manual tumor volume, MTV) and conducting sequential [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET scans at one, two, and four weeks after treatment induction. The biological tumor volume (BTV) was derived from PET scans using threshold-based volume of interest (VOI) measurements. Tracer uptake was measured semi-quantitatively as a tumor to background ratio (TBR). Mice were euthanized due to excessive tumor growth according to the ethics protocol; blood samples were drawn for the preparation of full blood counts and kidneys were obtained for histological analysis. For the histological assessment, a standardized score (renal damage score, RDS) was used. Full blood counts showed significantly increased numbers of neutrophils and lymphocytes in the groups receiving PRRT. All other parameters did not differ relevantly. In the histological analysis, groups receiving PRRT had a significantly higher RDS, whereas everolimus only tended to cause an increase in the RDS. Mice in groups 1 and 2 had to be euthanized due to excessive tumor growth two weeks after the start of the therapy, whereas follow-up in groups 3 and 4 comprised four weeks. PRRT significantly inhibited tumor growth; the administration of everolimus did not induce an additional effect. A good correlation existed between MTV and BTV. PRRT significantly reduced the TBR. [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE PET is suitable for monitoring tumor growth in the applied model. The high efficacy of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE is not enhanced by the combination with everolimus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.