Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36551851›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2022

Cardiovascular Risk in Childhood Cancer Survivors.

Francesca Mainieri, Cosimo Giannini, Francesco Chiarelli

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact of exercise interventions on cardiorespiratory fitness in childhood cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francesca MainieriDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Chieti, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Cosimo GianniniDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Chieti, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Francesco ChiarelliDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Chieti, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
University of Chieti-Pescara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is a prominent cause of death worldwide in the pediatric population. Since childhood cancer is not possible to prevent, it is essential to focus on a prompt and correct diagnosis followed by effective, evidence-based therapy with individualized supportive care. Given the enhancement of childhood cancer management over the past decades, survival rate has significantly improved, thus leading to the progression of several late effects, including metabolic derangements. These metabolic imbalances are associated with the underlying disease and the cancer treatments. As a result, the metabolic state may contribute to a high risk of cardiovascular morbidity and premature mortality among childhood cancer survivors. This review aims to summarize the potential pathophysiological mechanisms linked to the risk of diabetes and metabolic syndrome and screening recommendations. Further investigations are needed to clarify the underlying mechanisms of such metabolic abnormalities and to improve long-term cardiometabolic survival among these patients.

Indexed as

abdominal radiationchemotherapychildhood cancer survivorsdiabetesdyslipidemiahypertensioninsulin resistancemetabolic derangementsmetabolic syndrome

Identifiers

PMID36551851
PMCPMC9775574
OpenAlexW4311053773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.