Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36551828›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2022

Nicole Ramos-Solis, Tinslee Dilday, Alex E Kritikos, Elizabeth S Yeh

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole Ramos-SolisDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Tinslee DildayDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Alex E KritikosDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5814-4141
Elizabeth S YehDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Indiana University Health · USIndiana University School of Medicine

Funding

Immunology and Infectious Diseases Training ProgramT32AI060519 · NIAID · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI MARK H KAPLAN · 2004 to 2026
$6.0M
HUNK Regulation of IL-4R03CA245774 · NCI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI YEH, ELIZABETH S · 2020 to 2020
$159k
NCI NIH HHS R03 CA245774NCI NIH HHS R03-CA245774NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI060519
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hormonally upregulated neu-associated kinase (HUNK) is a serine/threonine (S/T) protein kinase related to the adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) family of kinases. HUNK was originally discovered using a screen to identify kinases expressed in the mouse mammary gland. Therefore, the majority of studies to date have been carried out in models specific to this tissue, and the kinase was named to reflect its mammary gland-specific physiology and pathology. Prior studies show a clear pathogenic role for HUNK in breast cancer. HUNK is upregulated in response to oncogenic HER2/neu and Akt, and there is strong evidence that HUNK is critical for the survival of breast cancer cells. Further evidence shows that inhibiting HUNK using a variety of breast cancer models, including those that are resistant, inhibits tumorigenesis and metastasis. However, HUNK alterations are infrequent. Here, the incidence and consequence of HUNK alterations in breast cancer is reviewed using data mined from the online database cBioPortal and considered in relation to prior research studies.

Indexed as

breast cancerHUNKmetastasisphosphorylation

Identifiers

PMID36551828
PMCPMC9775318
OpenAlexW4311005525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.