ArticleBiomedicines2022
Comparative Study of the Osteogenic Differentiation Potential of Adipose Tissue-Derived Stromal Cells and Dedifferentiated Adipose Cells of the Same Tissue Origin under Pro and Antioxidant Conditions.
Article in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- In-vitro evaluation of the proliferative and osteogenic activity of atrophic non-union derived mesenchymal stem cells compared to autologous bone graft derived mesenchymal stem cells.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Article
- In Vitro Evaluation of Mechanical Fat Processing Devices: Impact on Adipocytes and Adipose-Derived Stem Cells.Stem cells international · 2026Article
- Exploring the Therapeutic Potential of Dedifferentiated Fat Progenitors (DFATs) in Comparison To the Adipose Derived Stem/Stromal Cells (ASCs).Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Review
- Dedifferentiated fat cells-derived exosomes (DFATs-Exos) loaded in GelMA accelerated diabetic wound healing through Wnt/β-catenin pathway.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adipose tissue-derived stromal cells (ASCs) play an important role in various therapeutic approaches to bone regeneration. However, such applications become challenging when the obtained cells show a functional disorder, e.g., an impaired osteogenic differentiation potential (ODP). In addition to ASCs, human adipose tissue is also a source for another cell type with therapeutic potential, the dedifferentiated fat cells (DFATs), which can be obtained from mature adipocytes. Here, we for the first time compared the ODPs of each donors ASC and DFAT obtained from the same adipose tissue sample as well as the role of oxidative stress or antioxidative catalase on their osteogenic outcome. Osteogenic potential of ASC and DFAT from nine human donors were compared in vitro. Flow cytometry, staining for calcium accumulation with alizarin red, alkaline phosphatase assay and Western blots were used over an osteogenic induction period of up to 14 days. H
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.