Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36551748›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Comparing Genetic Risk and Clinical Risk Classification in Luminal-like Breast Cancer Patients Using a 23-Gene Classifier.

Chi-Cheng Huang, Ting-Hao Chen, Liang-Chih Liu, Chiun-Sheng Huang, Ji-An Liang, Yu-Chen Hsu, Chia-Ming Hsieh, Sean-Lin Huang, Kuan-Hui Shih, Ling-Ming Tseng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 82% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Chi-Cheng HuangComprehensive Breast Health Center, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-4378-4776
Ting-Hao ChenInstitute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei 106170, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-8318-616X
Liang-Chih LiuDepartment of General Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40454, Taiwan.
Chiun-Sheng HuangDepartment of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 300600, Taiwan.
Ji-An LiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40454, Taiwan.
Yu-Chen HsuDepartment of General Surgery, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chia-Yi 60002, Taiwan.
Chia-Ming HsiehDepartment of General Surgery, Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taipei 105520, Taiwan.
Sean-Lin HuangAmwise Diagnostics Pte. Ltd., Singapore 069547, Singapore.
Kuan-Hui ShihAmwise Diagnostics Pte. Ltd., Singapore 069547, Singapore.
Ling-Ming TsengComprehensive Breast Health Center, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan.
National Taiwan University · TWChina Medical University · TWChia-Yi Christian Hospital · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWTaiwan Adventist Hospital · TW

Funding

Amwise Diagnostics PTE LTD AMW201229
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A 23-gene classifier has been developed based on gene expression profiles of Taiwanese luminal-like breast cancer. We aim to stratify risk of relapse and identify patients who may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy based on genetic model among distinct clinical risk groups. Methods: There were 248 luminal (hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor II-negative) breast cancer patients with 23-gene classifier results. Using the modified Adjuvant! Online definition, clinical high/low-risk groups were tabulated with the genetic model. The primary endpoint was a recurrence-free interval (RFI) at 5 years. Results: There was a significant difference between the high/low-risk groups defined by the 23-gene classifier for the 5-year prognosis of recurrence (16 recurrences in high-risk and 3 recurrences in low-risk; log-rank test: p < 0.0001). Among the clinically high-risk group, the 5-year RFI of high risk defined by the 23-gene classifier was significantly higher than that of the low-risk group (15 recurrences in high-risk and 2 recurrences in low-risk; log-rank test: p < 0.0001). Conclusion: This study showed that 23-gene classifier can be used to stratify clinically high-risk patients into distinct survival patterns based on genomic risks and displays the potentiality to guide adjuvant chemotherapy. The 23-gene classifier can provide a better estimation of breast cancer prognosis which can help physicians make a better treatment decision.

Indexed as

adjuvant! onlineAsiangene expression profileluminal type breast cancerrecurrence

Identifiers

PMID36551748
PMCPMC9776657
OpenAlexW4312141256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.